Reasoning?
2006-10-04 17:04:12 · 8 answers · asked by Chris M 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
T.O.
he doesnt need the best QB in order for him to be a huge weapon. randy moss needs a really good QB in order to beffective. Moss catches the ball and runs his route. TO catches the ball and runs where he needs to run. TO is dangerous with the ball after the catch, Moss isnt. TO runs the short routes much better than Moss. Moss is really just a big threat downfield and if he beats you then you're dead, but he's usueless without a QB. TO is a threat downfield AND threat everywhere else.
2006-10-04 17:10:21 · answer #1 · answered by Preki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would take T.O. any day over Randy Moss at least T.O. does not give up on plays and run half *** routes , Last Sunday against the Browns Moss gave up on three plays that could have resulted in big time receptions , even the announcers saw it and pointed it out what a waste he has a bad attitude also , but he is on the right team for bad attitudes and a quitting attitude , T.O might have his faults but he is clutch !
2006-10-05 01:41:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
T.O. and Moss are two different types of receivers. Owens is a slower big guy who is the possession type not the deep threat speed guy that Moss is. Plus given the two teams that they play for Owens will have a better season. If I had to choose one it would be Moss because he stretches the field for everyone else.
2006-10-05 00:09:54 · answer #3 · answered by Joseph M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which Moss? Randy or Santana?
If Randy...it's TO by a long shot now, randy is way past his prime and mostly did good because he had a long ball thrower in Culpepper, now that they don't have each other, they both suck...TO on the other hand is probably the most physical reciever in the league...his only problem is his personality, but in terms of reciever qualities, he wins.
If u mean Santana...it's still TO just because he has the size advantage
2006-10-05 00:12:15 · answer #4 · answered by dabeardemon89 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, they are different types, that's true. Moss is more the explosive type that will suddenly out of the clear blue, beat the crap out of his girlfriend or some stranger on the street, whereas TO is more like the constantly oozing wound that never heals......
Oh, I'm sorry you said better RECEIVER? I though you asked, better troublemaker.............
I'm sorry, never mind .................
2006-10-05 10:11:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
T.O. commands double coverage.
2006-10-05 00:18:56 · answer #6 · answered by me 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
T.O. by a longshot. Great speed, too.
2006-10-05 00:11:20 · answer #7 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares ? Can either one compare to Marvin Harrison ?
2006-10-05 17:57:31 · answer #8 · answered by UK Fan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋