English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

would you vote for Arnold Swartzneggar (???spelling). If he can become governor of a state then why not president of the country.

2006-10-04 15:40:53 · 11 answers · asked by Jacks036 5 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

I would support the change.

Many military dependents are born on foreign bases, and can't run. That's not right.

2006-10-04 15:43:46 · answer #1 · answered by Villain 6 · 1 1

They'd better NOT change the U. S. Constitution to allow people born in another country to run for president! We're in a bad enough way with politicians who don't care about our citizenry without giving in to any person with a complete other focus.

As for being a governor as preparation for president, Republicans have done miserably recently on that score. Reagan couldn't control his people and spawned Iran Contra, and W is even worse.

We need someone who is knowledgeable, savvy, and cares about this country. Ah-nold just can't cut it.

2006-10-04 15:46:40 · answer #2 · answered by nora22000 7 · 1 0

Heck no, I would not! And how many times has this question been repeated on here?!
A President should be a natural born citizen of any country I think. I want someone who was born and raised in the USA and has experience as a citizen from the beginning.
Also, why do we need another actor to be President? Especially one who has no experience with the law and has caused many problems as a result of not understanding the political process.

2006-10-04 15:46:06 · answer #3 · answered by Cub6265 6 · 2 0

After Arnold then who? How about an Israeli for president? or a Russian or Chinese?
No. This Article in the Constitution prevents wealthy and powerful outsiders from grooming someone from birth to be their puppet. Forget that noise.

2006-10-04 15:58:07 · answer #4 · answered by GJ 5 · 2 0

I wouldn't vote for Arnold but I would support amending the constitution.

2006-10-04 15:47:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because being born in a overseas united states has a tendency to make someone in part biased to that united states. won't be able to have that type of equipped in bias. it could be confusing to bypass to conflict antagonistic to the country you've been born in. in reality common sense.

2016-12-04 07:01:43 · answer #6 · answered by gravitt 4 · 0 0

Is there no end to your brilliance? Are you from the land of fruit and Nuts? Hasn't the last six years of having an incompetent fk as the prime leader shown you anything?

2006-10-04 15:48:45 · answer #7 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1 0

I don't think so I could never understand why anyone would want an actor holding public office. Must be in the water out west

2006-10-04 15:44:22 · answer #8 · answered by roscodog 3 · 2 0

Can't think of bigger mistake.

2006-10-04 15:55:13 · answer #9 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 2 0

Never, oh, on second thought, NEVER.

2006-10-04 15:44:23 · answer #10 · answered by rikv77 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers