July 1991: Question: "Have you ever used Marijuana or any illegal drugs?"
Answer: "I've never broken any drug law." - Arkansas Gazette, July 24th, 1991, p. 8B
Asked this 3 times, on 3 separate occasions, by 3 different interviewers, your Great White Hope repeated this claim. Until faced with irrefutable proof, that is.
Then he said: March 29th, 1992: "I've never broken a state law. But when I was in England I experimented with marijuana a time or two..." Later, in that same interview, "No one has ever asked me that question point-blank."
- The New York Times, March 30th, 1992, p.A15.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
2006-10-04 14:04:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Boredstiff 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
In the whole scheme of things, Clinton's failings did not hurt anyone other himself and his family. In fact he managed quite well despite the 55 million dollar witch hunt that had been meted out to him by the "(A)Moral Majority". Whereas a pervert like Foley is not an aberration of the Republican party, but a shining example of a corrupt, self serving, immoral party whose actions have caused grave damage to this country and hundred of thousands of individual lives in their pathetic quest for self serving gluttony and corruption.
Pedophilia is indefensible. The smoke and misdirection ploy is overdone. Open your eyes and see the hell on Earth your party is creating.
2006-10-04 14:44:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by GJ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of you have your answer from the solutions so far, they deflected interest form the Clinton's crime (perjury) by using continually asserting "It replaced into basically a bj". different examples of excuses on the time have been "Oral intercourse won't be intercourse" and "All adult males cheat" (do you ask your self the place that excuse replaced into for Newt or for that rely Sanford or Craig or hi even Edwards). I bear in mind interpreting a speech performed by using a youthful Senators aide which suggested "If he (the president) have been given on nationwide television and lied to the yank public, he could be impeached and bumped off form workplace" This replaced into Hillary some years until now invoice have been given on nationwide television and LIED to the yank public and or went until now the grand jury and lied to them, while that exceeded off Hillary's reaction replaced into it is an countless precise wing conspiracy. form of like as we communicate while tried bribes are suggested, the lefts reaction is "Politics as popular" and that makes breaking the regulation ok. Or is it basically the very popular double standards the left seems to have maintained for years?
2016-10-18 12:27:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by mcsweeney 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kinda of like Cons are still obsessed with Clinton.
You do know that Bill Clinton is no longer the President, right?
2006-10-04 14:30:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Barney Frank? Gerry Studs? Just a faded Lib. memory?
2006-10-04 15:26:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is there a class that your ilk attends where synapses are severed and new ones are replaced so that you only see the most illogical and hypocritacal views possible?
Wake up dude! Your hypocritical murdering party is going down in self-fanned flames.
2006-10-04 14:17:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
At this point I really think the libs are entranced by this Foley thing.
They are too focused on it.
We have already condemned him as a party and they won't quit. Weird!
2006-10-04 14:14:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Let's see cheating on your wife with another consenting adult. Or lying about wanting to have sexual relationg with an underage boy. I think the second is worse, because it is actually a felony offense
2006-10-04 14:11:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Lying about a blow**b or lying to the world about Iraq. Gee, what's worse?
2006-10-04 14:11:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by manabovetime 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bill was caught lying. No cares about his sorry sex life.
Really? And how big of a deal did the republicans make about BJ's? How many millions of tax payers dollars did Starr waste on that pathetic investigation? 55 million?
Back to the drawing board spin man.
2006-10-04 14:06:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋