the NYT has jumped on a story ( flushing Koran, Wepons " missing" from USA sites in Iraq, etc. ) that later have been proven either false, taken out of context, or "leaked" by the ever present annonymous sources that have been detrimental to President Bush or the war on terror ( particularly Iraq)....I am looking for a list to show how desperate the Democrats are to cause trouble for Bush that they don't even research their attacks first. If is negative they print first...prove? later.
2006-10-04 13:36:50 · 4 answers · asked by USAjane 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
International Banking
NSA Wiretapping
Leaked passages of the NIE
The entire Valerie Plame supposed "conspiracy"
It printed that the new Detainee Bill would allow self incrimination under duress and then retracted it the next day.
They stated Steven Centanni of Fox news was released "unharmed" after being forced to convert at gunpoint
They printed staged photos in Lebanon.
Should I go on? ;)
2006-10-04 13:48:55 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Alright the New York Times, "all the news that fits, we print"!!!
2006-10-04 20:43:21 · answer #2 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's okay. We like a "free" press... Helps us keep our eyes on those slippery libs!
The NY times: If it's in there, it ain't news!
2006-10-04 20:51:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if it's so blatant, why can't you find these yourself?
2006-10-04 20:41:48 · answer #4 · answered by Nick F 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋