Is it true some conservative Republicans want to mount high powered machine guns on the new fence with Mexico?

Question

Would it just be cheaper to nuke all Mexicans within 100 miles of the US border?

Can you feel that conservative compassion yet?

Answer 1

mines are cheaper option...

Answer 2

extra like professional -ending the conflict we began . i'm hoping you have an open recommendations and open ears . Pay close interest to what Hillary says and what Obama says . Neither considered one of them would flat-out withdraw the troops from Iraq . Oh specific , they the two say so , yet consistently incorporate a disclaimer on the tip by utilising announcing 'properly, not each and all the troops' or 'properly we would withdraw lots of the wrestle troops yet we would desire to shop a goof rigidity there'.. . .blah blah blah . they are couching their positions and statements . so they are announcing one element hoping that maximum on the left concentration on those statements , collectively as advert libbing yet another place on the comparable time . Political mincing of words . one element the democrats do understand. . . . . an entire withdrawal from Iraq would be a catastrophe . If any of the dems have been to win the presidency there isn't any way they had withdraw those troops for the time of their administration because of the fact the certainty is the certainty. . . . it would be A catastrophe . EDIT ** - i think I would desire to've been extra specific and sparkling . Hagel's place exchange into that of the democrats , not of the republicans . He exchange right into a pariah . He went from a achievable presidential run , to retiring . that's a helluva sign that his positions did not replicate those of his occasion . So in my previous reaction , i exchange into declaring that his place is the comparable because of the fact the democrats place and the two are not valid . the two are executed to assuage thoughts and don't replicate certainty . You pronounced that Hagel's opinion is that we are going to have worry in the middle East for years yet to return. . . . . . . that's IT suitable THERE ... . . . that's the emotional appeasement that i exchange into conversing approximately . that's a non-assertion because of the fact absolutely everyone with an open-recommendations and open-ears is conscious that we've had problems in the middle East for some years and we can proceed to have problems there until eventually the unconventional islamists are defeated . one thank you to verify this logically and not the illogical way of blaming the U.S. is this -- It ain't our fault there or everywhere if there's a evil hateful team consistently attempting to clutter issues up . It ain't our fault whilst people isn't civil . It ain't our fault if people choose to be evil and hateful . And it ain't our fault whilst they call for we convert or die . it somewhat is THEIR situation , not OURS !!

Answer 3

What's wrong with putting machine guns on the fence?

Nukes would be a bad idea, that close to our own population centers.

I feel compassion to the 300 million law abiding Americans that the illegals are stealing from and making life harder for. I feel compassion for the American citizen that can't go to a hospital, because the flood of illegals caused it to go out of business. I feel compassion for the family of the cop that an illegal just shot in the face.

Where is your compassion for you fellow American?

Answer 4

I'm sure that there are some out there on the fringe that want to do that. Most, I think, just want the government to do the right thing: secure our borders and re-establish our sovereignty. Since when do we need another country's approval to build a fence in our country, anyway?

Answer 5

par for the course if would seem, killing people is so easy when you don't have to do it yourself.

It would not be the first time that the true feelings of American politicians and people towards their southern neighbors resulted in blood being spilled.

One need not look further the utter disgust that President James K. Polk had for the Mexicans. Among his campaign promises he vowed to bring Oregon and California under American control. Given a mandate by a slim margin of the electorate, Polk eventually accomplished this feat. But by no means does this mean that Polk bears the heaviest burden of responsibility in causing the war with Mexico due to his extreme expansionist views. In reality, the unrelenting movement of Americans into western North America and the concept of a Manifest Destiny are responsible for the Mexican-American War.

Upon first examination, it appears that President Polk, with his aggressive promises and desire to gain California at all costs, caused the war. However, if one looks back one term to the previous President, one can see the foretelling of the Mexican-American War. Realizing his unpopularity with both major political parties, President Tyler saw the annexation of Texas as a ticket to a second term. If he could make the American people identify the name Tyler with American expansion, maybe he could overcome the disdain of both the Democrats and the Whigs (Combs 88). Unfortunately for Tyler, Polk won the election. Wanting to finish what he started, and perhaps to make a name for himself among America's Presidents, Tyler made use of joint resolution of Congress for the annexation rather than a treaty, which would have required a two-thirds majority that Tyler did not have (Combs 89). Finally, on the last day of his term, Tyler sent messengers to Texas for the purpose of immediate annexation. Mexico was not pleased.

Now, the outcome of the above events could have been easily avoided by the new President. If he would recall the messengers and agree to negotiate a new treaty, Mexico would be placated (Combs 89). Polk did no such thing and Mexico declared that the annexation was an act of war. Premonitions of the Mexican-American War can actually be found in the lame duck days of President Tyler's administration.

The actions of the President of the United States have a profound impact on America's foreign relations. However, in some instances, the actions of the people have an even more profound impact. This was certainly the case with the Mexican-War. The settling of Texas and other western areas played a major role in the war that would be fought between America and Mexico. But why would these settlers knowingly move west of America's present boundaries, and even into foreign territory? The answer is simple: economics. By moving ahead of "official" settlement in the U.S. proper, these Americans were hoping to "get in on the beginning of the price rise" (Lavender 127). In other words, these people wanted to sell the land at high prices when it became part of the United States. There were also plentiful trade opportunities as well as a distressing power vacuum out west. What made these settlers and traders think the land would one day be part of the America? History up to that time showed how America had constantly expanded westward across the continent. America showed no signs of stopping anytime soon. The idealistic concept of Manifest Destiny also convinced people to move West. For them, certain parts of North America were simply "destined" to become part of the United States; the French, English, Spanish, Mexicans, Russians and the Indians be damned (Newhouse 142).
The forward thinking settlers simply presumed that America would eventually assume their new lands. Then they could sell the land at higher prices to farmers, plantation owners, or whomever when the land finally was part of the United States. In effect, these settlers were waiting for America to "catch up" to them (Lavender 127).

So go ahead, kill all your enemies, kill them all and let god sort them out, but tell me when they are all dead who are you going to sell your goods and services to?
Where are you going to get the cheap child labor?
Oh I forget, you have those nice white poor Europeans that can pick up the slack, or do you intend to go back to Africa and hunt down the rest of the slaves

Answer 6

No there is no plan to put machine guns on the fence. But you knew that. You just made that up hoping that someone would believe it and be against the republicans. Please stick to the truth.

Answer 7

Yea, and Bush wants to clone a billion Elvis' to vote him in agian.

Yet another reason to vote against anyone with a (D) by their name.

Answer 8

That would be great but that's not true they want to mount camaras on the walls.

Answer 9

I havent heard that

Answer 10

History repeats itself. Think "Hitler", "fence", "high-powered machine guns", and THESE secret plans to come!...
http://www.global-conspiracies.com/fema_concentration_camps.htm
http://www.gnn.tv/threads/9229/FEMA_DEATHCAMPS_AND_THE_RED_AND_BLUE_LIST_UNDER_MARTIAL_LAW
http://www.thepowerhour.com/news2/ftct.htm
Who do you think the REAL terrorist is!?...