2006-10-04 13:27:15 · 37 answers · asked by Nadia M 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hell no!! Only if you think torture is good, human rights don't matter, the environment is not as important as making lots of money, the country will be OK as long as the rich keep getting richer, not necessary to take any personal responsibility for your own mistakes, its not embarrassing that the Pres. can't finish off a sentence, are fine with sending our troops to be killed for imaginary WMD, think giving up your civil rights out of fear is a way to support a democracy, are happy about being spied by the govt, and I could go on for ever but I think you get the idea...
2006-10-04 13:39:12 · answer #1 · answered by TrueSoul 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
in element of shown actuality that each and every individual presidents might want to be attributed to both good and undesirable issues. Even Clinton and Bush have performed both good and undesirable issues. both, as an social gathering, did large with the monetary equipment, yet Clinton did a poor job on terrorism and Bush has failed around the international. one challenge about Bush, even with the actuality that ... if Iraq and Afghanistan do manage to sort some style of sturdy representative governments in the subsequent 10-two decades, historic previous will manage Bush kindly. If no longer, he will rank in the bottom 1/2 of all Presidents.
2016-12-04 06:55:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good for what ? No the torturer in chief is totally divorced from reality and he's tied his presidency to the outcome of the war in Iraq. If the US were a train, I would be looking for a place to jump as soon as it slows down.
2006-10-04 13:34:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think George Bush is leading America in the wrong direction. He is isolating us more and more from the rest of the world.
With that said, I consider him one of the worst US Presidents ever!!!
2006-10-04 13:30:47 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. G 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I don,t think he will be carved in Mt. Rushmore but considering the mess he has had to deal with no one can say what anyone would do in his position. And he is fighting a war on so many fronts against terrorism and political adversaries that will not rest until they bring the man down even if it means jeopardizing this countries safety and strength all in the name of political power.
2006-10-04 13:44:51 · answer #5 · answered by Iknowthisone 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Seriously, along side Reagan who committed treason with his Iran/Contra arms deal to get elected, Bush is not only the worst president in the history of the USA but he has single-handily done more damage than any other president.
2006-10-04 13:30:44 · answer #6 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I don't even consider him a President, he's a demagogue. History will teach our grandchildren to learn from his mistakes, that's the only good I can ever see coming from this nitwit's occupation of office.
2006-10-04 13:39:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course not , he's an idiot and an industrial puppet that just wants to reap benefits . He may not be the worst of the politicians but he is pretty close . he's proved time and time again to have been a horrible choice and he didn't really win the first election , he had his brother "help" him and the second he won with fear .
2006-10-04 13:33:20 · answer #8 · answered by kame 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
no, he lets the oil companies rip the american peopleoff on gas prices. His only focus is war war and more war. He doesnt understand the american people in general, dont know how he ever got reelected
2006-10-04 13:34:27 · answer #9 · answered by jimmy fan101 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-10-04 13:29:04 · answer #10 · answered by glitterprincess 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋