David Cameron has been talking about SUBSTANCE - shouldn't he also be concerned with what's NORMAL & NATURAL ?

Question

Jamie Oliver's become really popular - because he wants our children to be fed properly - and has exposed the apalling inadequacies of school dinners - nothing is more normal or
natural than a FATHER wanting the best for his and other children.

A normal HETROSEXUAL married man who's not phyiscally or mentally handicapped, but nonetheless is unemployed and had the audacity to be self-employed previously, whose wife has a full time job - is NOT eligible to receive unemployment benefit or EVEN a clothing allowance for job interviews !!!

But David Cameron's in favour of SAME SEX Civil Ceremonies - people who'll never be able to produce children NATURALLY!

MY question is this - hasn't he got his priorities wrong ?

Along with sorting out the National Health Service - shouldn't he be helping normal hetrosexual, able-bodied men to find work and allow them unemployment benefit and not penalise them for being married ? ONE GROUP MAKES BABIES - THE OTHER DOESN'T - is normal wrong now then ?

Answer 1

Hey there, more power to you if you think that someone's sexual preference makes them a better person.

Most people in this day and age look past the appearances and vote for the issue. If food for kids and welfare is more important to you than same sex marriage, then vote that way.

BUT if you think for more than a second that there aren't heterosexual loving couples out there who also cannot have children "naturally" and therefore THAT should be the defining issue, you really need to do the rest of us a favor and go back to the 13th century. (oooh, what about those who CAN make babies and CHOOSE not to, they get to be punished too, right?)

Answer 2

Men need to gather themselves to raise each others self worth as you are doing.

Sadly, when men get together to get "Woman's Rights" they are often giggled at by society. I loath ppl who want free stuff (regardless of sex, race, creed, or religion) and would prefer to abolish stuff that gives social benefits to once social group over another.

I think South Park did a spoof on some of these themes a few seasons ago ... I'll see if I can find the episode. BTW - my dark side of my mind glows when I watch South Park - and I think, "OMG I can't believe I just giggled at that"!!! Jokers have to be social brilliant savants to create successful jokes; since 80-90% of the jokes are based on real stuff. I'm now finding out how real South Park is and it scares me .

Answer 3

yes I agree