During this whole catastrophy, no homosexual has ever been interviewed on a Fox news show and asked if they embrace the behavior of Mark Foley. The only people who have been interviewed are bigots who hate homosexuals. Shouldn't a sociologist or psychologist be interviewed? Does asserting Homosexuality help Foley? How?
2006-10-04 13:00:26 · 14 answers · asked by Reba K 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
As a conservative I will not make any excuses for him.
2006-10-04 13:01:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I watch quite a bit of BOTH Fox News & CNN and I haven't heard anyone blaming homosexuality and I've heard no one trying to get Foley "off the hook."
Why do you think everyone Fox interviewed hates homosexuals? Because they are conservatives? Isn't it bigotted to assume ALL conservatives are gay-bashers?
2006-10-04 17:08:15 · answer #2 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually the guy who turned in the information that Dennis Hastert knew 3 years ago, and HE IS THE ONE WHO TOLD HIM, is a known gay man. So, yes, a homosexual did turn in Foley 3 years ago to Dennis Hastert and they did NOTHING ABOUT IT.
As they said on the News tonite, alcoholism and being molested as a child HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT FOLEY DID. This is smoke and mirrors and its not going to work.
2006-10-04 14:05:05 · answer #3 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
even as that's incorrect...that's incorrect...and Republicans do not stand for it. it quite is the version between us and Libs. seem at each and every of the immoral acts perpetrated through Liberal politicians and they are nevertheless in place of work. yet BTW, there's a immediately transforming into allegations on line that the textual content messages were a web page prank because they knew Foley "loved" boys...They were in simple terms joking round on line and the messages were given picked up through Democratic operatives. received't that be a kick in the right for the Dems no matter if that's shown. possibly it quite is why the web page employed a legal professional....he knew the prank develop into about to get busted....hmmmmm? do not get me incorrect, I easily believe Foley is a creep, yet i imagine this may all suitable backfire on the Dems no matter if that's shown that this "scandal" develop right into a political dirty trick to effect the election. In different words, it develop into okay to them that Foley develop into gay, till they could positioned it to their earnings.
2016-12-04 06:52:46 · answer #4 · answered by mallie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure it's one step in the GOP's plan to eventually make being a homosexual a felony. The fact they are trying to compare pedophilia to homosexuality is just ludicrous. No homosexualshave desires to sleep with little boys. In fact you'll find it's almost always married straight men that molest little boys. But common sense is something that seems to escape the GOP.
2006-10-04 13:05:36 · answer #5 · answered by neofascistpriest 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As Pierre Elliott Trudeau, former Prime Minister of Canada once said: The government has no business in the Nation's bedroom. I agree wholeheartdly. However, when it comes to pedophilia and the sexual abuse of younsters under 16, the government has a responsibility to the very young generation. It should serve to protect it through its police force.
2006-10-04 13:07:26 · answer #6 · answered by Lois L 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think asserting homosexuality plays into the discrimination against gays, implying if Foley is gay,that what he did is natural behavior.
2006-10-04 13:05:04 · answer #7 · answered by beez 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Turn on the news. The blog that posted the IMs has said the receiver of the IMs was 18 at the time and is 21 now.
2006-10-04 13:08:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
They are trying to spin any way they can, they are even blaming the democrats for Foley's folly
2006-10-04 13:06:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Demoncrats should be interviewed to find out how ling they sat on this information. I've heard they had this info for at least three years AND were warning pages about Foley since 1994!!!
2006-10-04 13:03:54 · answer #10 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
This is a mess. The Republicans need to clean house. Both parties need to have a clean house. This means NO illegal, unethical, immoral behavior trangressed by any of it's party members. Period.
I'm sick of the party bantering. Politicians of ALL persuations need to represent the best that America has to offer.
2006-10-04 13:04:10 · answer #11 · answered by YRofTexas 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋