English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Pretty farcical - they announced shutting Ayr A&E tonight - how nuts is it having one Accident & Emergency in Kilmarnock for the whole of Ayrshire?

2006-10-04 11:34:02 · 11 answers · asked by LongJohns 7 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

Well certainly not in local services thats for sure unless u count the management of the trusts' pockets' The government want to privatise our national health service. Our local A & E is closing to as is the maternity ward. It will take 30 mins to get to the next hospital and there is talk that their A & E is closing, then what? The country has gone crazy, or should i say the present goverment has!

2006-10-04 11:47:45 · answer #1 · answered by english_rose10 3 · 1 1

I AM GOING TO GIVE YOU A SOLUTION TO YOUR PROBLEM!!!
Forget the NHS its finished
20 or 30 years ago it was sustainable we had half the population we have now through immigration.
What the government needs to do is charge every household 20 pounds per month direct to the health service and everyone contributes.
that would pay towards health care its a fiver a week each and you would get the people sorted i live in Spain and i can use my
E111 for health care who pays you in England for me to be in sunny Spain and when I'm poorly i come home its free !!!!
no wonder the NHS is in crisis.
by the way i don't use the E111 I PAY 94 EUROS A MONTH TO THE Spanish HEALTH CARE.
BUT IT MAKES YOU WONDER DONT IT.

2006-10-06 01:25:18 · answer #2 · answered by tonyinspain 5 · 0 0

Pretty simple that one. Labour's subservience (or a**e-licking in their case) to Europe means that they sign up to every little law passed by Brussels/Strasbourg which results in a mountain of bureaucracy which has in turn to be read, signed and filed. The cost of implementing these petty rules and regulations costs millions of pounds owing to the need to employ thousands of administrators. Not only that, the NHS has far too many chiefs and not enough indians. Get rid of Blair's rabble, vote for Nigel Farage (UKIP), tell Brussels to p*** off, go back to making our own laws, Tear up or shred the unnecessary mountains of paperwork, give a sizeable pay rise to all our doctors, nurses, surgeons, put Matron back in charge, and put ancillary duties back in-house again. That will cost us much, much less, and we will have a health service that the UK can be proud of once again.

2006-10-04 11:44:02 · answer #3 · answered by TrueBrit 3 · 1 0

Think it is very poor the A&E in your area but I think at least part of the answer is in the IT project and it is rubbish and very over budget and heads should roll because apart from the detrimental effects on services, some sods have lined their pockets by many millions of money that could have gone on patient care and staff training and welfare

2006-10-04 11:43:17 · answer #4 · answered by william john l 3 · 1 0

It went where it was supposed to go, into the NHS, you are forgetting that the even back in 2002 (latest figures i could find) the NHS cost 68 Billion pounds to fund or to put it another way more than 186 million pounds a day!

2006-10-04 11:47:50 · answer #5 · answered by thecoldvoiceofreason 6 · 1 1

A lot goes on paying for the growing number of compensation claims. It seems that the uncaring/money-driven doctors who treat people are making more mistakes than ever.

2006-10-04 12:07:11 · answer #6 · answered by A True Gentleman 5 · 0 0

Cars for managers and chief executives. Last year they spent 70 million on non essentials. Its a bloody disgrace

2006-10-04 11:37:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Politicians pockets!!

2006-10-04 11:38:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes, invading other countries for oil for AMERICA is unjust for the scots.

2006-10-04 11:43:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not in my bank account, unfortunately...

2006-10-04 11:37:21 · answer #10 · answered by Laura T 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers