Or is it only election stunt by destroying Irans Nuclear sites.But then they will be risking Russia and China joining the conflict and hence World War 3.
2006-10-04 09:27:24 · 10 answers · asked by Dr.O 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Russia and China don't have enough biz at stake to risk WWIII
2006-10-04 09:30:21 · answer #1 · answered by Brand X 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that we (USA) should pull back to the borders of IRAQ and establish a non- Military Zone in the whole zone. Allowing the Iraq's to finish there " Civil War"! While the Iraq's are finishing there civil war we should not allow!! Weapons of any kind to cross the border, or personnel!! All (USA) stations should include a commissary for the Iraq's to buy food, medical supplies at a reduced rate.
No American Citizens should be allowed to participate in the rebuilding of the country while the conflict rages, and until a government is chosen " by the people" through a democratic system, and a police force is established and the unrest of a civil war is completed the world should not disturb this area.
If alQuita decides that they want to be a terrorist organization and terrorize the united states, I think our reply should be the same as the threat!!
Use nukes, gavity bombs, earth quake machines, or "Black Jack Pershing's" techinques for containing the muslem extremists! Pull out our new "war technology's" and use Iraq, and Iran as a test bed. If Syria want a piece of the (USA) destructive power " give it to them, in a manor to win !! If china thinks it is to there best intrest to attack!! Let them !!
We beat China in Korea, And gave them Vietnam!! At a cost of serveral hundred thousand american lives.
Freedom is not Free, for our Freedom has payed for in Blood, and Lives of American Citizens around the world.
Pray for peace, build for war!!
Pray for forgiveness, for the world has not seen the American War Machine in full action since WWII.
Osama Bin Laudin, has declared war on the United States of America he should be tried as a war crimial and or treason if we catch him!!
I do not want to see another Vietnam!! ever in my life time!!
This war has cost, too much, and has gone on for too long!
IF THEY WANT WAR.....WE'LL SHOW THEM 100% of what we can do, and what we should do!
The media here in the usa has been down playing the Towers disaster as more people were injured or killed than in Pearl Harbor. And, these were inicent civilians. Women and Men that were killed because some "islamic Jahaid" (holy war).
I guess i am just tired of seeing the "bleeding heart liberial's" leading this country. in short, if they want war!! Show them how it is done!! And if this means a genoside then perform it!!
2006-10-05 13:01:23 · answer #2 · answered by Ultrasonicdan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Greetings!
The Americans will not launch an attack against Iran and Syria. It would if failed taking into account what has happened in Iraq, be the demise of the party in control.
Forever.
Now the Russians would not back anyone. If you recall their stock of missiles are in the hands of now free soviet states. Also their Army is but for show.
The Chinese would not enter the fray, because they are already destroying us economically without firing a shot.
When you have the mobile weaponry that the US has you by attacking other nations for any reason is a wasteful use of human American lives and families.
Park your sub 3 miles offshore and if attacked......end it all
Of course we have in our times witnessed some dumb things which would not have been done had their sons and daughters been forced to serve.
Good Luck
2006-10-04 09:38:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hardly an "election stunt". This is a vital national security issue. We currently have only a fraction of our total military resources deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's time to move against our other enemies in the Mideast. We need to hit them hard and hit them fast. Afterwards we can move on to deal with the N. Koreans.
2006-10-04 09:36:01 · answer #4 · answered by Wayne H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you made up the first statement. No one wants to start a war with Iran and Syria. If all out war did occur, both Iran and Syria would be destroyed. Both or either would last about as long as Iraq did in the last war.
2006-10-04 09:32:36 · answer #5 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
From a 2016 attitude, from the concepts-set of the U. S. government and, to a plenty lesser quantity, the concepts-set of a few (I stated some) American posters here with their withering contempt for the united kingdom and contempt for 'liberals' and worship of weapons and God (reported 'Gahd'), maybe we would as properly shop our funds spent on defence and withdraw to our little island. The individuals extremely do no longer seem to delight in us besides. It saddens me through fact I honestly have constantly in demand the u . s ..
2016-12-08 08:27:22 · answer #6 · answered by minissale 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't think that WW3 is likely, or even realistic. But we don't have the military strength to win with our current commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan.
2006-10-04 09:35:25 · answer #7 · answered by Atheist81 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
non-conventional weapons should definitely be used
nukes to take out the fortified nuclear sites, chem to take out the troop concentrations. this will decrease the need for troop deployments, since democrats have a phobia when it comes to troop deployments (or any military exercise for that matter)
unconventional weapons have already been used when planes hit our towers. lets show them who wears the balls in the world. mess with the bull, get the horns.
2006-10-04 09:30:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no they would NOT win. it would be verry verrrry veerrrrrrryy UGLY
2006-10-04 10:34:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES!!!! If they do it by covert means, they can win!!!
2006-10-04 09:30:42 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋