Think worst case scenario to both, the ruthless armed robber/rapist is perhaps a racist too and the opposite race as you, has killed people in the past etc. The dangerous wild animal is hungry or protecting her little ones or protecting his teritory/herd or is perhaps injured! Which is a greater risk to face?? And why do you say that??
2006-10-04 08:42:08 · 8 answers · asked by Sunbeam 5 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
ruthless armed robber. Way worse to face, plus, I think that if I lived, I would carry hate for him in my heart forever, and as a christian I am not supposed to. Cover me in honey and throw me to a bear, not to the robber/rapist.
2006-10-04 08:45:31 · answer #1 · answered by The Nag 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately for the human race I believe it would be the robber/rapist. Why? Because most animals will only react in the scenarios you presented(injured, protecting her young, etc.) while a ruthless human being may attack and kill for no reason at all. I'm far more afraid of man than beast. We're living in a jungle in this day and age and it's not the animals we should fear.
2006-10-04 15:54:59 · answer #2 · answered by okmyrna 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A dangerous wild animal is looking for food or an escape from any threat.
A armed robber wants money or jewelry or cash.
A rapist wants to force you and will take money.
Race has nothing to do with the animal.
The robber does not care what race you are, if you have a wallet or a Rolex watch.
The rapist does not care either.
Last year a man killed a woman beacuse she frowned at him in the parking deck of a mall. A minute before that the woman who he was going to kill he did not because she smiled at him and basically disramed him by appearing to be friendly and not worth killing--true story! The woman who frowned at him deserved to die in his mind.
2006-10-04 15:45:14 · answer #3 · answered by god knows and sees else Yahoo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People can be much worse than any animal, dangerous, wild, or other. People have an innate ability to do things that even animals would not do - rape, torture, cause mental as well as physical pain. I would much rather be eaten alive than even try to imagine what the worst of the human race could do.
2006-10-04 15:52:16 · answer #4 · answered by JustJake 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
person is more dangerous
If they are armed, they can easily kill you, if they are angry, they will kill you for no reason, and there is no way to really lessen their desire.
A wild animal - probably the worst in North America is a bear, and usually they'll give you a good swipe or a good bite, and then run off with their young.
A moose might be another possibility, but again, they'll usually just knock you down and give you a kick or two and then run off, unless there are other circumstances where you've been really torturing them.
2006-10-04 15:48:28 · answer #5 · answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they are all animals, if both can kill like the wild animal then they are all the same. You have to be some sort of animal to kill a human being.
2006-10-04 15:52:21 · answer #6 · answered by mom_in_love 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd say the human, we are the greater preadator and can use weapons like guns at further range than a bear with claws can attack.
2006-10-04 17:53:55 · answer #7 · answered by Charles B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would run in the other direction from all of those
2006-10-04 15:46:28 · answer #8 · answered by GD-Fan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋