2006-10-04 05:35:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
Have you been noticing recently that the general excuse for making managerial changes is "We've decided to pursue a different direction". Gotta Love it.
The blood that runs through the veins of the team is pumped into the system by the coach. Sometimes (sometimes not) a blood transfusion appears to be the answer.
2006-10-04 06:59:11 · answer #1 · answered by -:¦:-SKY-:¦:- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well...they are the ones leading the teams, making decisions in regards to lineups, pitchers, etc. The right one can really make the team work. Look at what Leyland has done for the Tigers this year. In most cases too, this is not an overnight decision...but in the end, what happens a lot is the chemistry isn't there between a team and it's manager to create a winning combination. Maybe the players don't respect the manager and don't play well for him. Maybe the manager can't figure out what to do to get results from the players. It's gotta be a good fit on both sides or it's not going to work. These managers are paid quite well and they should be able to produce and in many cases are given plenty of chances. If they can't do it, they need to go. It's the same in any sport, not just baseball. Look at the end of say NFL seasons, NHL, college...hell even NASCAR racing for that matter! These are the people leading the teams...if they can't produce...they're outta there!
2006-10-04 12:40:36 · answer #2 · answered by Sunidaze 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a harsh reality, but it's cheaper to fire the manager/head coach than it is to fire all of the players. The team owners have to fire somebody, just so they can seem proactive. Also, the fans don't come to the games because of the manager or the head coach, well, at least not in most cases. Fans come to see the star athletes. There may not be any valid reason for a coach or manager to be fires, but it's something that must be done.
2006-10-04 12:48:23 · answer #3 · answered by Michael L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have played baseball for 11 years and I have been asked this question many times. The answer is very simple, The manager is in charge of putting the right players on the field. I realize he can't go make outs for the team or hit homeruns, but the managers job is to get the team wins in whatever way possible.
2006-10-04 12:41:23 · answer #4 · answered by Taylor R 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They're just the easiest guy to change, much more so than trading a team of 25 players.
You're right, though - they can only do so much when given a poor team, and it's often the GM's fault more than the manager. The transactions a team makes are much more important to winning and losing than in-game decisions.
2006-10-04 12:40:19 · answer #5 · answered by Craig S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The managers manage, they lead the team. Changing a manager can help a team a lot, or hurt it. Owners know that. Maybe it isn't always their fault, but it is a game and each team needs a scapegoat.
2006-10-04 12:49:12 · answer #6 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a game the owners play called 'musical managers'...everybody gets a turn...lol
Considering the salaries, I wouldn't feel too sorry for anyone who gets fired in baseball...usually some other team will pick up the manager in some way...
2006-10-04 12:51:13 · answer #7 · answered by marnefirstinfantry 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is very true. And not an easy question to answer. When a team loses, someone's head has to roll and often unfortunate managers become the scapegoats.
2006-10-04 18:10:32 · answer #8 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that it's not entirely the managers fault but they are in charge of making player selections in the lineup and that could result in the outcome of the game. Good question!
2006-10-04 12:38:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a lot easier to fire 1 guy instead of the whole team.
2006-10-04 12:37:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋