GUJRAT SHUD ALLOW ALCOHOL AND MOVE WITH TIMES. TOURIST WUD FLOCK TO IT AND PUT GUJARAT IN THE TOP LIST. AND STOP THE ILLEGEL BOOT LEGGIN.AND SAVE MANY LIFES. Y CNT TOURISM MINISTER SEE THAT.
2006-10-04 05:12:29 · 6 answers · asked by raju k 1 in Travel ➔ India ➔ Ahmedabad
When the majority of the Society decides to dump hypocracy and opt for rectitude.
2006-10-04 21:39:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will not be relaxed. Because Gujaratis are against lifting prohibition. Secondly it is the birth state of Mahatma Gandhi who is also against it.
I do not agree with your point that allowing would improve the tourist activities. As it is Gujarat is attracting quite a good number of Tourists round the year.
2006-10-04 06:08:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am positive the tourism minester see that but Gujrat is the birth place of Ghandi so out of respect for him we wont drink around him..oh wait?...he has been dead for 59 years?.....we still wont drink in his birthplace just in case his ghost comes out of nowhere and kicks our butt. What would Ghandi do, thats the philosophy in Gujrat. You wont find a legally operated bar there, at least not in your lifetime. That being said, if wanna have a few drinks in Gujrat drop me a line, i'll see what we can do about it.
2006-10-04 06:23:09 · answer #3 · answered by The Richest Man in Babylon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
at the same time as the 'regulations' that you recommend do make extremely some sense, they'd be completely no longer conceivable to 'implement' in any authentic way. regrettably, there'll continually be those who imagine it really is 'ok' to drink and then get in the back of the wheel of a automobile and stress it ... and those human beings will proceed to 'kill innocuous human beings' in different vehicles and contained in the vehicles they are utilizing, no count what the 'regulations' say. i imagine that this international will be 'significantly better suited' if human beings were no longer allowed to emphasise 'deepest automobiles' contained in the city ... yet i recognize that there will be far too a lot of human beings 'on the busses' if that became made right into a regulation ... and what about the bus drivers? do not they 'deserve' to have a 'automobile' to experience in or stress at the same time as they don't look to be operating? and could no longer 'ingesting and utilizing' be put in 'citation marks' to expose human beings that you're speaking about making doing both together/close to time unlawful ... as you position it, it style of feels to assert that you're for making both ingesting (one component) and utilizing (yet another component) althogether unlawful ... at the same time as what you say that 'ingesting and utilizing' together/close to time must be made unlawful. it really is a 'good question' although, and that i imagine that you ought to imagine about a career in both 'regulation' or 'authorities' because the international desires human beings like you who can 'imagine' alongside those 'very controversial strains' if we settle on to 'replace the international for the better suited' in all recommendations.
2016-11-26 02:27:41 · answer #4 · answered by bruckner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully never. Alcohol is not something to be promoted.
2006-10-04 08:04:01 · answer #5 · answered by reigning queen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BUY LEGALLY IF YOU HAVE FOREIGN PASSPORT. AS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTS, I THINK BAN IS A GOOD IDEA.
2006-10-04 08:17:31 · answer #6 · answered by Trans Atlantic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋