...to allow them to serve a third term.Who would you vote for?
Clinton (proven liar) or Bush (proven idiot)
2006-10-04 05:09:31 · 14 answers · asked by rosbif 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Clinton. A quote from a former teacher of mine"I have no respect for Clinton as a man but I have respect for him as a President." I think Clinton would've handled everything better after 9/11.
2006-10-04 05:18:52 · answer #1 · answered by missgigglebunny 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So it's come to this. Even in hypothetical questions this is the best choice that we can get.
Isn't there anyone in America more qualified for the most power full position in the world than Bush and Clinton?
Between the 2, I choose Clinton.
2006-10-04 12:15:59 · answer #2 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
History will look at Clinton as one of the best leaders of all times. On the other hand , history will look at Bush as a follower not a leader. A puppet if you may.
2006-10-04 13:19:22 · answer #3 · answered by DAVID S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for Clinton. Yeah he lied, but how many of you wouldn't have denied it just like he did. I've seen guys get caught literally in the act and they still try to wiggle out of any admission of guilt.
He is waaaayyy less abrasive than GW, and so less likely to offend somebody from another culture.
Clinton is proving himself to be a pretty good ambassador for our country. He is not faking his personality, and he has the benefit of hindsight.
I'm just not so sure that he can undo all of the damage done by GW.
2006-10-04 12:25:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You mean changed back - FDR served 3 terms!
I would not be able to vote for either - I live in the UK. Of those two Clinton is the lesser of two evils.
2006-10-04 12:18:43 · answer #5 · answered by monkeymanelvis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton.
2006-10-04 12:26:08 · answer #6 · answered by ag_iitkgp 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Goodness, of all the changes to make! Just letting them have a longer run?
Here's a change for you. Why not one person one vote when electing the president? If you did it on that basis, then you could overthrow the two term rule because then it would truly be democratic.
2006-10-04 16:03:15 · answer #7 · answered by 13caesars 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off, President Bush is not an idiot, he may speak horrible, but he isn;t an idiot.
Second, former president Clinton was definately proved a liar, and I would NEVER vote for him.
The constitution shouldn't be changed either.. sorry. it's the way it is for a good reason. I would vote for Bush cuz he's strong on the morality and good principals that this country was founded on.
2006-10-04 12:13:39 · answer #8 · answered by Cyber Spacer 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
If they are the only 2 choices, I would have to vote Bush. With Bush, I know what I have, Clinton would just lie about being an idiot.
2006-10-04 12:14:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
I think both are about as bad as the other... but Clinton had charisma and did more good things (overall). He's also a better speaker, and more funny material for comedians.
2006-10-04 12:13:56 · answer #10 · answered by Jessie 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋