Yes he would definitely fit in a regime of corruption and lies.
2006-10-04 04:28:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chuck P 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
i think of a third celebration Candidate can get elected, quickly. I trust the analogy with regard to the Republicrats. the great concern is getting something accomplished, in Washington, with the present gadget. OBAMA have been given his butt kicked with almost equivalent help in Congress. think of being of neither company *** kissing celebration. it could be a nightmare and the reason i'm no longer voting for Jill Stein, my favourite candidate.
2016-12-12 20:24:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Come on, that's completely unfair. Everyone makes mistakes, why should President Bush be an exception. Tell me, did you ever do drugs? I know I did, in high school. Sure, you're not president, and neither am I, but everyone has a past.
Foley is not representative of the RepuBlican party, any more than Ted Kennedy (Poor Mary Jo), Michael Dukakis (you know, the guy who released a CONVICTED MURDERER out of prison on furlough, who then went and tortured a guy and raped the guy's fiance for hours?), and/or Bill Clinton (I'm not talking about Monica, I'm talking about the stuff that was swept under the rug. You know, the sexual harassment and rape charges? Oh, and the draft-dodging, can't forget that!) are representative of the Democratic party.
I prefer to think of the Democrats as the ones who gave us FDR and Truman, who were both amazing presidents, with very little to NO scandal in their private lives, or their policies.
Perhaps we should also remember that there have been many decent Republican politicians, or at least Republican politicians who have done great things for our country.
2006-10-04 04:31:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
1⤊
6⤋
1. First, it is the Democrats who worship amoral, unethical and criminal politicians - drunken adulterous murderer Ted Kennedy, drunken druggie Patrick Kennedy, KKKer bigot Robert Byrd, corrupt whorehound cowardly liar Clinton, etc.
Republicans have a proclivity to forcing scum like that out of the party, not of making them the face of the party like Dems do.
2. "coke-snorking"? Baseless and unproven allegation. However, in a sting operation that netted Roger Clinton, he was noted to have talked about his brother who had a "nose like a vaccuum cleaner". Hmmm.. Roger Clinton only had one brother... who could it be?
3. Alcoholic. Yup. Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic. But it doesn't mean he hasn't been clean and sober for decades.
4. "no morals"? Perhaps you could illustrate this base malignment with some proof? Everything I've seen President Bush do and say had shown him to be an honest, caring, moral Christian. Except when he called, accurately, the NYT reporter an 'assh0le'. Uncharitable, but true.
Considering the daily onslaught of a virulently hostile and leftist press and a virulent and loony opposition party, he has never responded in a childish, lie-filled, insulting tantrum like we witnessed from Willard Clinton last week.
5. Yes, he is a born-again Christian. And it is evident, if you were able to see reality with unbiased eyes, that he is a very decent Christian.
You people are so boringly tiresome and unoriginal. You haven't the wit to do more than echo the tedius insults of second rate minds.
2006-10-04 04:37:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
Clinton was elected in 1992 and 1996, not 2000 and 2004.
The Clintons pretended to have religious inclinations at the right times. They made sure they went to churches to campaign and had prominent black clergy pimping for them. They also made sure they were photographed at church on Easter and other religious holidays. Who is the hypocrite?
2006-10-04 04:24:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robby216 4
·
2⤊
8⤋
I love that alcohol SPIN
In all my life I never saw a drunk guy say "Hey lets go molest some kids"
This whole thing will smooth over in a couple weeks and Folly will be back on top.
Go big Red Go
2006-10-04 04:27:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
7⤋
No, but he's a perfect fit for the Democrat party. He'd fit in pretty good with a party that supports a rapist (Clinton) a murderer (Kennedy) and a KKK member (Byrd).
2006-10-04 04:28:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous 7
·
1⤊
6⤋
If we wanted the democrat vote he would be.
2006-10-04 04:43:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
He's got to be right up there with "DEAD EYE DICK CHENEY"!?!
http://www.toostupidtobepresident.com/shockwave/sorrycheney.htm
2006-10-04 04:27:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
interesting parallel but i don't think so. maybe 2012.
2006-10-04 04:26:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Boring 5
·
1⤊
3⤋