2006-10-04 03:54:11 · 13 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Amazing the logic this group has, isn't it?
I think most Republicans will just vote for another Republican. And unless this guy was representing Rio Linda and Palm Beach we should not have to worry about a Democrat winning that seat.
2006-10-04 04:06:23 · answer #1 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You didn't ditch a pervert. He ditched himself. Your republican leadership tried to cover this up for well over a year so I think your party is very welcoming of perverts.
2006-10-04 10:59:13 · answer #2 · answered by courage 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No absolutely not! All this stuff and nonsense about Folley is nothing more than a smokescreen because after all the other party has no real plans, no real policy other than raise taxes,gay marriage,and an attitude that anything goes. Don't you think they are being just a little bit hypocritical after all their party supports nambla {through the aclu}.
2006-10-04 11:18:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I expect we will have a record number of Republicans switching to the good, decent Democrat Party.
2006-10-04 11:14:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Obviously there are perverts on ball side in politics, none should be accepted!
2006-10-04 11:24:27 · answer #5 · answered by Star 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Please don't. I definitely don't want new members of the Democratic party who equate Mark Foley and Bill Clinton's sexual indiscretions. If you don't know the difference between the two, I'd prefer you remain among the party of the misguided...
2006-10-04 11:14:27 · answer #6 · answered by Mark M 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's pretty lousy spin,even for you!
America is tired of right-wing hypocrites,such as people who will tolerate ANY atrocity from the far out Right,including Abu Ghraib and meddling in Terry Schaivo's life for political gain.
This question sheds some light on it:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061002082842AAnP2gq
2006-10-04 11:01:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
You didn't 'ditch' anyone. Foley resigned. Your party didn't even investigate him for ethics violations.
2006-10-04 11:24:23 · answer #8 · answered by Balaam's Talking Donkey 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i take it you must be talking about the republican party? Oh I see you are talking about Bill Clinton...Yeah if it wasn't for him sleeping on the job the Japanese would not have attacked Pearl Harbor, darn that Bill Clinton.
2006-10-04 11:12:38 · answer #9 · answered by Chuck P 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That would be the Neocons, are you switching sides now?
2006-10-04 10:57:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋