Isnt it great thet the dems have come to agree with Republicans that sexpredators have no place in government?

Question

too bad their support went the other way with Studds, Frank, Clinton and the (d) congressman that Clinton pardoned for having sex with a 16 yr old.

Answer 1

Suck it buddy. I stopped caring what the guy did with the page when I found out the page was 16.

Answer 2

I don't know whether it is funny or sad that members of the party of personal responsibility respond by talking about other people's misbehavior when faced with the news that the head of the congressional committee to prevent the exploitation of children was aggressively sexually pursuing children.

I do know that pretending to yourself that Republicans agree sexpredators have no place in govt is probably so delusional as to suggest you need a mental health exam - the republican leader knew almost a year ago and let Foley stay, and stay involved with kids - and newt gingrich explained why - it would lead to republicans being accussed of gay bashing. And that probably made sense to Newt, as he cheated on two wives when they were desparately ill - last time, while he was hounding clinton, newt was cheating on his wife with MS with an office employee of Gingrich's.

I do know that it is absolutely pathetic to equate clinton's seduction by and frolicing with monica to Old Foley hassling little boys with sex talk. It shows you have no ability to judge morally (but we could tell that since about, oh, dec 12, 2000.)



Now, aren't you embarrassed to be exposed as so totally morally corrupt and totally not into 'personal responsiblity?'

(I know the first thing I always do when someone tries to hold me accountable is to present a list of others who have done (or haven't done) what I've done.)

Also, Frank did nothing wrong, his tenant did, Clinton didn't pardon Studds, he commuted his sentence, and the boy was 17.

Answer 3

Election time politics from the left its typical

Who keep 3 year old instant messages?

The difference with Republicans and Democrats is we Republicans denounce this behavior and he resigned as he should, but the Democrats embrace it and try to spin it saying well its personal. Like they did with Clinton, Studds, and Frank

Furthermore, the legal age for consent in DC is 16. Of course you won't hear that from the left

Answer 4

The politics of this is disgusting. They smear a man without facts. I thought liberals are defenders of the Constitution. What ever happened with innocent until proven guilty?

Answer 5

The Demorats ONLY focus on what serves THEIR purposes. If what's his name had sent e-mail to a horse, they would have jumped on that. The fact that THEY have been PROMOTING homosexuality for years has nothing to do with it(?)? To date, there is no evidence that the jerk ever had contact with a kid, but you do not put a fox to guard a hen house, and you do not put a queer where he/she can have contact with a bunch of under aged queers. Too much temptation for them.

Answer 6

Studds,Fank,and Clinton have more moral character than you do
if you look at their full profile. All you do is ask right-wing slanted
questions any REAL American laughs at.

Nice try. Pot/kettle/black.