I'm not a democrat or republican. I'm a realist. I see things the way they are. His "War on Iraq" was bullshit! He went over there saying they had "Weapons of mass destruction" Right? They didn't find anything! Yet our troops are still over there! Then he decided to change the story saying Saadam treats treats his people cruel. That's like France trying to arrest Bush because America's gas prices went up! The point is when you're the leader of a country you can do whatever you want! Just like when Bush was on vacation went the World Trade Center got bombed! I wouldn't be surprised if George Bush planned on bombing the trade center to get more votes! I remember a speech he said, "America's at war, and if you vote for me I'll get us out." Now doesn't that sound like bullshit to you? Also, America has protected air space, if a plane goes off course the government is notified to take it down. Bill Clinton got impeached for cheating. Why doesn't Bush get impeached for ******* up the country
2006-10-04
02:13:19
·
20 answers
·
asked by
mystique
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
What's right isn't always popular and what's popular isn't always right. I am sorry if you don't agree with our president. I don't happen to agree with those who have the nerve to "arm-chair quarterback" a situation without knowing all the facts and understanding the pressure it takes to make a decision for a nation. And yes....it is obvious from your paragraph that you don't know all the facts, and that of the ones you think you have, you are sadly misinformed.
2006-10-06 18:23:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by bloomquist324 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
If you have to ask this question your self than you need to do a little more research. If you or any political party can prove that he has done something illegal than we can talk about impeachment. I for one do not agree with everything he has done but I understand he has decisions to make whether they are popular or not. Everyone can sit here and complain but no one can come up with something better. The problem with people like you is you discredit your self by throwing out stupid comments like "I wouldn't be surprised if George Bush planned on bombing the trade center to get more votes!"
I don't like Bush but I am glad someone is in office that doesn't pussy foot around. He makes a decision and follows threw with it. If past president had done the same thing we would not be in this situation.
2006-10-04 09:42:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by jamie s 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The liberal way of thinking comes to mind here. The President shouldn't be bashed for all this "chaos", you speak of. Of course he has a mess on his hands, and all of it bundled up basically only represents a foretelling of the near future- as well as a crash course in history come to bear. I refuse to point fingers at my President and blame him for the way another culture, or some extremist people has always felt about civilized people. I wonder what any good old country folk in the back woods of America would do if one of them were Boss for a day...Lol- make a big park out of the middle east? or perhaps slow things down...bring all our guys home, batten our hatches a bit, and bite hard and deadly if from then on anybody gets in our face?
2006-10-04 09:40:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Diadem 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A realist? If you were a realist you would realize that we hold elections in this country every four years for the president. WMDs were one of 19 reasons we went to Iraq, so there are still 18 good ones. Bill Clinton did not get impeached for cheating. A suggestion for you. In the future perhaps you might consider having some idea what you are talking about, it makes for better arguments - just a suggestion.
2006-10-04 09:27:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Colorado 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
To begin.. you have many false arguments... there WERE WoMD and WoMD components found, just not widely picked up on by the liberal media... to be impeached, it would have to be shown that Bush committed a felony (like Clinton did with the crime of perjury, not "cheating").... The troops are over there not for war currently, but in peace keeping so that Iraq has a chance to set up it's free and democratic form of government.... To think that a President is ever fully on vacation when he travels, is a ludicrous assumption.....
Try and learn a little before you spout of diarrhea of the keyboard
2006-10-04 09:25:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by DiamondDave 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Aside from the fact that your "Question" is actually a rant filled with simple partisan rhetoric...
Why is he still President... because he was elected and his term does not expire until January of 2009. The House of Representative has NOT created Articles of Impeachment... and with regard to those who whine that the Congress is controlled by the Republicans... IF there were actual crimes committed that would meet the requirements of the Constitution... Impeachment would go forward.
And please remember... William Jefferson Clinton was impeached for PERJURY.
You're entitled to your little conspiracy theories... but PLEASE read the Constitution.
2006-10-04 09:50:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by mariner31 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
The Republican control the House, and the Republican control the Senate. The situation with Foley is a microcosm of the same situation concerning Bush; the Republicans will not hold one of their own accountable for anything.
2006-10-04 09:22:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
We have become a nation of wimps to busy with our own greedy life to care about our national gov. Can you imagine the leaders we now have trying to write a constitution for a new nation. Not counting the vote cheating George has good handlers who make him very likeable. We are so gullible and continue to this day to be led like sheep to slaughter.
2006-10-04 09:26:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by bungee 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
The war on terror is primarily in Afghanistan, not Iraq.
There were WMD's in Iraq and there were documents recovered from Saddams intelligence department. The documents are online, why not actually read them?
9/11 is a tragedy. To blame anyone bu the terrorists that did it is to really lose touch.
Suck it up...there have been worse and there probably will be worse in the future..
2006-10-04 09:23:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Q-burt 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Wow. Yahoo didn't censor the word bullshit? I'm shocked.
2006-10-04 09:21:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by trafficjams 4
·
3⤊
1⤋