Bush would lose a fight with Yoko Ono, and she's 75 years old...
2006-10-04 02:02:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vinegar Taster 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Well first I doubt that Bush personally allowed him to do was just like hey yah buddy go ahead test that nuke. The nuke testing will be done if 6 party talks do not resume. That is something im more frightened of not this silly terrorist nonsense and war in iraq.
But there is nothing to be gained from doing anything about Iraq
except the lives a couple hundred million americans, I mean its not like they have oil or anything that would benefit them.
2006-10-04 02:01:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, its not a fashion. The Bush administration merits all varieties grievance for spending lots money on Iraq that became into of no probability in any respect to any united states of america in besides. All that ingredient allowed the Taliban to regroup in Afghanistan and Pakistan which allowed them to accomplish heinous acts of terrorism. and of course there is often North Korea, with which the Bush administration engaged diplomatically each and every of the time. Judging from the nuclear attempt, i think of that son of a lunatic (Jong-Il) has doing not something yet procuring time; it is for constructive. military action would desire to be interior the final hotel, and that i think of that ingredient would be exceptionally quickly, even according to probability now. we could desire that Obama administration and different countries surely handle North Korea.
2016-10-15 12:23:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
North Korea is a sovereign nation. They do not need the permission of Bush.
2006-10-04 01:59:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by cherox 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Because of his stupid adventurism in Iraq we have no military alternative coupled with his administration's lack of diplomacy they cannot go that route. Of course many will say we should just bomb them that would lead to about 10,000 US military dead in a week making Iraq look like a day in the park. The re institution of the draft would follow and guys like you could put all your tough talk to good use. As for Dumya going over and slapping anyone he lacks the physical courage do to that, so forget that one.
2006-10-04 02:02:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Georgi Girl 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
I would agree with you, but you may have noticed that he doesn't pick on nations that may very well present a defense. Also he won't go personally, but send the children of others to die in his futile wars.
2006-10-04 04:29:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if he steps on the N. Korean toes too hard, they might decide to test their nukes where the Americans tested theirs some 60 years ago (Hiroshima, Nagasaki)
2006-10-04 01:58:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
wow, I missed that on the news, where did you hear that? That is scary, seeing though I live near the ocean in California, we would be the first to go
2006-10-04 01:57:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Star 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
because N Korea has no Oil or he just doesn't see $$$$ in doing anything with N Korea.
2006-10-04 01:56:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Probably because it's none of his business. Why does the USA always think it has a right to police every other nation?
2006-10-04 01:57:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
5⤊
2⤋