English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I currently use 16x, but wondering what the difference is with an 8x

2006-10-04 01:35:51 · 16 answers · asked by big_roy_lwc 2 in Consumer Electronics TiVO & DVRs

So is it simply the writting speed, there is no difference in quality?? Just saying one is faster doesnt really help i could of guessed that, i want to know what effect that has, please.

2006-10-04 01:43:30 · update #1

16 answers

If you are trying to copy a 160 minute DVD file to a disc, it will take ~10 minute with a 16x DVD-R and will take ~20 minutes with a 8x DVD-R

2006-10-04 01:38:54 · answer #1 · answered by Vinni and beer 7 · 0 0

The 16X can write twice the speed of the 8x simple as that

2006-10-04 01:37:31 · answer #2 · answered by poli_b2001 5 · 0 0

16 x speed is twice as fast than 8x.

But personally, through experience, a slower recording speed produces better quality. So if I have the option to record, i'd choose 8x.

2006-10-04 01:55:00 · answer #3 · answered by Busy Diyosa 5 · 1 0

8x is half the speed of 16x. You may have read issues with older DVD players if you are making DVD movies. if you have read issues you can try lowering the speed to 4x.

2006-10-04 01:39:30 · answer #4 · answered by reconflux 2 · 1 0

simply 16x is twice the speed of 8x

2006-10-04 01:37:27 · answer #5 · answered by alfred u 2 · 0 0

simple,a 16x drive is faster than a 8x drive.
www.google.com

2006-10-04 01:44:12 · answer #6 · answered by sandy 2 · 0 0

Basically, the faster the speed, the quicker it takes to burn on to a DVD

2006-10-04 01:47:36 · answer #7 · answered by Presea 4 · 0 0

I am not sure but i think 16x is faster and better

2006-10-04 12:46:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

When was the war of 1812 fought?

2006-10-04 01:39:09 · answer #9 · answered by rucirius 3 · 0 2

about 4 and a half minutes quicker burn time

2006-10-04 01:46:21 · answer #10 · answered by kiki 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers