2006-10-04 01:32:05 · 15 answers · asked by rimrocka 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The whole repuglican party is the party of hate, Mark Foley is just a symptom, the illness is buried deeply in the repuglican politics of hate. The cover up needs to be investigated even more then the acts of Foley. We need to set things right with America and the world. The repukes will never in a million years do this as they are way to busy covering their azz.
2006-10-04 01:39:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
For "I don't hug trees" adultery is not against the law, unlike trying to bugger teen boys you idiot. As for the question yes Foley epitomizes the GOP he is the head of the committee for exploited children; he sponsored a bill to punish adults for trying to seduce children on line. Couple this with the attempt by GOP leadership to cover the entire episode up you have a microcosm of what the GOP stands for. Not to beat an old horse, but then in quick succession he is an alcoholic, a homosexual and was abused by a "clergyman" ....please.
2006-10-04 01:41:48 · answer #2 · answered by Georgi Girl 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, Foley simply epitomizes the fallibility of all people...both conservative and liberal. However, scumbag that he is, Foley did highlight one striking difference between Liberals and Conservatives. He left in disgrace. Liberals who have been caught in some sort of morality scandal, often have their faults ignored and go on business as usual, leave kicking and screaming about how they are being discriminated against, or go to "rehab" and come back and are celebrated for their bravery.
So, there is no hypocrisy. Conservatives when they falter receive their retribution. Liberals when they falter...not so much.
2006-10-04 02:21:00 · answer #3 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mark Foley is a developing story, the reaction to which epitomizes the messed up priorities of people that put "got ya" politics over sincere expressions of concern for the actual victims. How very sick, indeed. You might even say it's perverse.
2006-10-04 01:35:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
He sure as hell behaves accordingly. First committing the crimes, then being ousted and ashwed, then finding excuses and checking into "rehab" for whatever flimsy reasoning.
In rehab he then can wait until the public got tired of the story or another scandal retired his.
Typical GOP tactics. Has anyone at the GOP apologized to the boy? Now that would be a first; but i guess they are too busy covering their a.s.s.e.s. and claim they have only heard of that from the ABC newscast.
2006-10-04 01:36:23 · answer #5 · answered by The answer man 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sen. Craig's political occupation is in all threat over. The abuse of ability, in spite of the actuality that, replaced into no longer Sen. Craig's in spite of the shown fact that the media's, who %. and choose whose privateness they're going to violate on a partisan beginning. what variety circumstances have been we subjected to self-righteous harangues approximately how investigations into besides the actuality that if Clinton solicited intercourse from subordinates (thereby cheating on his better half) have been intrusions into his "very own existence?" the situation have been in the well-liked-day's guardians of ethical and political rectitude back in 1969 at the same time as Democrat Ted Kennedy drove cut back than the end results of alcohol and with a suspended license off a bridge with Mary Jo Kopechne left to drown indoors his motorized motor vehicle? the situation have been the liberal media outcries to kick Democrat Barney Frank out of the Congress at the same time as he solicited a gay prostitute who in turn set up shop in his condominium? the ingredient keeps to be: Democratic sexual indiscretions are ok at the same time as Republicans' are honestly no longer. that's a double widespread.
2016-12-08 08:11:30 · answer #6 · answered by declue 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep
2006-10-04 01:34:41 · answer #7 · answered by freyas_kin28 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know it!!
It's insane isn't it? And all the ones who've known and looked the other way and are now distancing themselves and calling him a dog!! AGHH
2006-10-04 01:35:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
no but that George Soros had the IM's and no one else knew and that he put an election before children's safety does epitomize the Democratic party.
2006-10-04 01:44:24 · answer #9 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No, Dennis Hastert does since he helped cover it up.
2006-10-04 01:34:00 · answer #10 · answered by Balaam's Talking Donkey 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋