2006-10-04 00:37:57 · 8 answers · asked by meena 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
AB de villers is a good catcher(as he is a keeper)
Micheal clarke is a good accurate one hand thrower to stumps
each has plus points
so both are equal to me
2006-10-04 02:41:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course Ab de Villiers is much better fielder than Michael Clarke. The case with Michael Clarke is: He misses some oppertunities, but all of them will be recovered from his team-mates. But Ab de Villiers has to do all on his own. He hasn´t got as better fielders in his side as Michael Clarke has.
Rawal.
2006-10-04 01:39:10 · answer #2 · answered by Tony 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clarke
2006-10-04 19:41:38 · answer #3 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ab de villers
2006-10-04 00:43:32 · answer #4 · answered by prabhan_a 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
AB Devilliers..coz his catching is better than clark...ground fielding is same...but Devilliers doesnt drop chances whereas clarke does
2006-10-04 20:00:12 · answer #5 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
de villers is wiki men! you can compare with clarke
2006-10-04 04:50:18 · answer #6 · answered by saladin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ab de villiers cuz he does not let the ball get away or pass away from him!
he is always capable of stoping it!
visit the link below-
http://content-ind.cricinfo.com/southafrica/content/player/44936.html
2006-10-04 00:48:35 · answer #7 · answered by aki 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both coz both have their own quality.
2006-10-04 21:12:18 · answer #8 · answered by 007 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋