Rule of law is in constitutional terms just a phrase that can mean or refer to a multitude of scenarios. As a result your question is arguably too wide to promote an accurate answer supported by decisive authority.
It is also arguable that your question contradicts its self, because the use of the word 'society' refers to a collective agreement by a group of individuals, to recognise a set of values and rules, that may be described as the rule of law. This form of social contract in turn forms the cohesive element necessary in order to describe a group of individuals a society. Therefore with the absence of the rule of law in this context there can not exist what you call a society.
However if what you are hinting is what happens if you remove the structure that provides order, the answer theoretically must be chaos.
2006-10-06 15:35:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by pcg2645 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the opposite of the rule of law is rule of will. This means the law will not be fair. In the rule of law the person at the scales is blindfolded. If someone does wrong, no matter who, they will suffer the consequences of the law. Rule of will leads to favoritism and classism, and gross injustice.
2006-10-04 00:40:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by dat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
rules are what make a society yet no longer inevitably penal codes and government etc. Durkheim referred to social information that are the guidelines of way of existence that are no longer constantly written or spoken or maybe bodily enforced. quite, maximum of those are norms that if one have been to bypass against they might sense as though they're being judged or may be ostracized. in this way we are coerced to act a definite way out of outrage of no longer installation in. Take as an occasion bathing. we does no longer bypass to reformatory if we've been basically grimy yet we does not extra healthful into society. So in this way the very definition of society is a collection of regulations.
2016-12-08 08:10:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by declue 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anarchy and then a totalitarian dictator. Nature abhors a vacuum, in the absence of rule of law, chaos occurs, then some dictator or group of clans/local strong men step in. It happens in Africa all the time.
2006-10-04 00:49:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Violation of Human Rights!
Corruption!
Anarchy!
But.. what if the law itself is against the fundamental rights enshrined in the constitution?
2006-10-04 00:42:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Justanian 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like Islamic law .
2006-10-04 00:36:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If they fail to accept it, laws will become unimportant and anarchy will begin to take hold.
2006-10-04 00:38:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not as big as you would suspect. Check out Christiania, an anarchist sort of freehaven in Oslo where they have no laws.
You expect chaos, and it's not there.
2006-10-04 00:37:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
See Pakistan.
2006-10-04 00:38:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chaos!
2006-10-04 00:36:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋