What is inside, or on the reverse of a black hole?

Answer 1

A parrallel universe? other galaxy? Celine Dions' Husband?
Wimpy's profit margin?

Answer 2

Stephen Hawking theorized that this cannot be known. A black hole records no information. Everthing that enters it becomes part of the "singularity." You can tell nothing of the history of a black hole or what has entered it, no matter how you might study it. Consequently what is on the other side, inside, or on the reverse of a black whole are questions for science fiction writers and not seekers of knowledge, at least not in the fashion of the scientific method.

As the Copenhagen school demands (usually applied to subatomic investigation) -- if a theorized particle or event cannot be measured or investigated, then it does not exist.

While my theological side disagrees with this statement, it does seem to be a useful precept for scientific investigation and theory. This is where Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle becomes so important. Simultaneous motion and position do not exist. Weird.

Answer 3

>could you opposite the pull of a black hollow saaay in case you dumped a crap ton of anti be counted interior it? No. Black holes do no longer distinguish between be counted and antimatter. as quickly as a particle passes the black hollow's adventure horizon, it is in a area of spacetime the place the only course it may bypass is farther into the black hollow. that is not substantial (no pun meant) no be counted if the particle is a controversy particle, an antimatter particle, or the different form of particle. >what we destroyed each and all of the black holes, could area end to be a vacuum? There does not look any solid rationalization for that. That stated, that is been pronounced that via raising the potential point of a area of area intense sufficient, we could be waiting to reason area to undergo an element transition and give way into some decrease-potential state (in all probability killing us all interior the approach). that's oftentimes a vacuum metastability adventure, and what you're conversing approximately sounds rather like it. >could this impact the cosmological evolution of galaxies? in all probability no longer that a lot. it form of feels that black holes could have been substantial in seeding the 1st galaxies, yet at this element interior the Universe's history it does not look that black holes are mandatory to the persisted existence and progression of galaxies. >How could we even transport this anti be counted with our be counted? in all probability making use of magnetic fields.

Answer 4

To me, a black hole is just matter really, really compressed. On the inside of a black hole is just elemental particles that are so close they cannot move. (and that is close). On the 'other side'? well, it's not a magic portal to other dimensions or anything so it is just an object in space. There's space on the other side.

Answer 5

I think a black hole is a star with gravity so strong that anything that is within its gravitational pull gets pulled into the core of the star and becomes part of it, because it cant get out either, so it just stays in the middle with everything else, to close to move, and unable to get away

Answer 6

Stephen Hawking

Answer 7

Some believe black holes are "worm holes" to another point in another galaxy. Some believe that they are "dark matter" sucking everything and anything into them.

Answer 8

Blue Light maybe, because the wavelength would be so short through gravitation effect, and at the singalarity highly compacted matter... even though before you would see that you would have been literally vaporised by the gamma and x ray emmissions lol

Answer 9

A tunnel across space-time

Answer 10

Probably all the odd socks and spare change I never seem to find - oh and quite likely my sanity...

I want my stuff back. Let me know what you find - keep the change, keep the sanity - I just want the socks...