how upset...100th?
how upset...1000th?
ie instead of say US$50,000, only US$5000, US$500, US$50?
would you be quite upset?
would you be very annoyed?
would you be ropeable [fit to be tied]?
would you be murderously angry?
would you join anything that looked like giving you any increased chance of getting more of your earnings, more of the fruits of your labour?
what is the range of personal [ie nonmachine-aided] productivity per unit of time, given that slacking gets fired, it is harder to try to get away with slacking than just to do the work?
90% of workers are paid between 10th and 1000th of world average hourly pay
are they like you?
do they wish they could be fairly paid?
do they feel robbed, enslaved, cheated?
would you?
is money very important, because it buys virtually all good things, including all necessities and major wants? - so is the theft of earned money allimportant, critical, angering, violence-generating?
2006-10-03 22:49:40 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Economics
And, your question is?
2006-10-03 22:53:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take your liberal outrage someplace else.
Okay they may only make a 10th of what I do but what is the cost of living? I'm sure in your twisted socialist mind you have a 'plan' to 'lift them up' but it will only drag the rest of us down.
Open rebellion isn't the answer comrade.
2006-10-04 05:55:49 · answer #2 · answered by N3WJL 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Too many questions and the universal answer would be yes, you fool. The pay is bad enough as its is.......whats your point?
2006-10-04 06:21:13 · answer #3 · answered by rondavous 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't happen so I won' be upset at all!
aaaaaaaaaaaaaah life is good !!
2006-10-04 11:31:35 · answer #4 · answered by Kitty 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋