I have heard that women under 5'4 will generally have more children than taller women, however taller women are more likely to have multiple births (twins, triplets...). Are there other physical signs of fertility? I also heard a small waist and large hips is a sign, but does it actually serve a biological purpose? For breasts, do larger breasts actually serve a biological purpose of being able to raise more children? Anything else?
2006-10-03 22:29:23 · 5 answers · asked by C 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
First of all, my ex-neighbor, who is only about 5'2" had a hard time getting pg, but is now carrying twins. I'm 5'7" and only have one bun cooking in there. I've never heard of any of these things making or meaning that a woman is more fertile. It is a myth that larger breasted women have better time breast feeding, which is the only reason I can think of for breasts making it easier to raise children. (If you bottle feed, the breasts are really only there for the entertainment of the father.) As for the biological purpose of the waist/hips thing, I don't think the waist matters so much, since you lose that when you're pg anyway, but the wide hips do make it easier to *carry* the baby when you're pregnant, and might help with the birth process, too.
2006-10-03 23:07:28 · answer #1 · answered by desiderio 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Height has absolutely nothing to do with fertility.... so just get that out of your head. The only thing that will have anything to do with it is the reproductive organs.
Wide hips make it easier to carry the baby and to deliver it but again has nothing to do with fertility.
Large breasts are just annoying and cause chronic back pain. They in no way make a woman able to raise more children.
What were you doing during Sex Ed classes at school?? Or havn't you reached that grade level yet?
2006-10-03 23:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by wickedly_funny66 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
nicely, signs and indicators of wellness and young toddlers are indicators of fertility - so, solid, healthful hair, sparkling tight epidermis, solid muscle tone. some human beings additionally argue that there are different indicators, like extensive hips (for ease in childbirth) and great boobs (possibly crammed with milk so which you realize the lady is fertile). yet in spite of this, factors like small ft (foot length is hooked as much as pelvic width, so some say the smaller your ft, the harder your labour would be) and surely, great boobs (breast feeding acts as a organic contraceptive to an volume) are additionally seen eye-catching, so circulate determine. the element is, the presence of a few of those factors basically potential that the lady is probably lots extra probable to waiting to conceive. In genuine life, it is not continually the persons you will desire to anticipate on the muse of tangible indicators who pop them out like shelling peas.
2016-10-15 12:19:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the wide hips thing seems to have been the case, every wide hipped woman I have known has been a baby machine.
2006-10-03 22:37:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a strange feeling that good looking women are more fertile.
Only because nature keeps telling me to try and hump them.
2006-10-03 22:37:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋