Montana. The mountain, snow capped hills. AWESOME!!!
2006-10-03 17:19:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eugene 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends, both are beautiful, Missouri is way more heavily populated than Montana...so I guess it depends if you like to be alone or surrounded by a lot of people. I have given this alot of thought, as MO is a state that I love to be in, the Smokeys are so beautiful esp. this time of year, but I don't like the high population and the Methamphetamine problem there. Good luck.
2006-10-03 17:21:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Nag 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe Missouri, but definitely not Montana. It depends what part of Missouri, St. Louis, Kansas City, Jefferson City, other.
2006-10-03 17:20:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have fished the Missouri above and decrease than Helena, Montana, yet not something that some distance down circulate. caught Silver Salmon , Rainbow Trout and the biggest great Northern Pike i've got ever seen caught by potential of a 12 year previous boy ( approximately 30 pounds).
2016-10-15 12:09:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Montana would be ideal weather, wide open spaces, beautiful Mountains, kinda reminds me of going back in time to the old days. I think I could do that! But on the other hand, I was born & bred in the South & I think I would miss it to much!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-03 17:20:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by char__c is a good cooker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no such place as Missouri, Montana. So, you can't move there...
2006-10-04 04:04:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by AF 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Montana would be nice.
2006-10-03 17:19:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Missouri only if you like sports and sporting women!
2006-10-03 17:20:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by whrldpz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why not a big change...Move to Resalute ;-)
http://www.marssurterre.net/fmars-09/20040603/first-air-map.html
2006-10-03 17:22:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you mean Missoula?
2006-10-03 17:19:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Susan M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋