Bit of a wash. Bulger is slightly above average, Clark is certainly worse than tony g. I'd prefer Harrison to Foster. If the Bulger team has a good qb, they probably did ok.
2006-10-03 18:01:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by football fan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
somewhat no longer! Tom Brady is incredible and Marvin Harrison is enjoying for a great group and remains an elite participant. Larry Johnson isn't any longer a megastar and cotchery is a jet, and not even the superb one. Harrison is better than the two a sort of fellows mixed. Brady, McNabb.....I shouldn't could say any further.Brady, a suitable of the line tud, the superb QB attainable, surrounded by using weapons. McNabb, an harm-riddled participant who's good yet unreliable. Deny the commerce without 2nd concept.
2016-10-18 11:07:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, who are your RBs, and who would be your QB?
If you have enough depth at RB, and another decent QB, say Brees or better, go for it. Clark is decent. Harrison is awesome. People forget that he is a slow starter. He'll have 1100 yards and 12 TDs, like always. Gonzo, who knowns with KC's mess at QB.
Foster won't finish the seaosn. Go grab DeAngelo Williams.
2006-10-03 17:21:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
bulger and foster outweigh gonzalez and harrison as far as potential points for your fantasy team
2006-10-03 17:21:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joseph M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
whoever is getting tony and marvin is completely awesome.
clark has done nothing...literally nothing. foster is losing more and more carries, and bulger is on a very overrated team.
2006-10-03 17:21:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Sheepdog 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
good for whoever is getting marc bulger
2006-10-03 17:37:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
well it depends on who your other QB are? are you in need of a starting WR!!
2006-10-03 18:16:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋