English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Because all I hear these feeble-minded freaks do is DEFEND a pervert by saying Democrats are perverts too; the underage boy(s) wasn't really underage, he was the age of consent--all the SICK twisted SPIN and talking points spouted by right-wing talking heads non-stop! Can we please get rid of these WASTES of space--they're bringing this country and all that it stands for DOWN!!!

2006-10-03 16:49:06 · 10 answers · asked by Agenda Dog 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

From Goose & Tonic:


" I'm pretty sure that other than yelling "FIRE" in a crowded theater, we still have the right to free speech. Foley did not comitt any crimes and in DC, where the messages were sent, the age of consent is 16."

2006-10-03 16:54:21 · update #1

From Jack:
"Were the individuals in question "underaged"? At least one of the "boys" was 16, and I believe that is the age of consent in DC. Of course what Foley did was wrong. But hey, he's gay and he drinks (as I said in another post, THAT's a redundancy...).

What about a Democrat "molesting" a child? After all, Foley started out as a Democrat. Maybe THAT'S the true root of his moral corruption."

2006-10-03 16:55:52 · update #2

From nicolasrage:

" Who is a child molester?
D.C.
CHAPTER 41 SEXUAL ABUSE § 22-4101. Definitions.

(3) "Child" means a person who has not yet attained the age of 16 years.


Now, if someone is bored, go back and see how many liberals voted on the age of consent to be 16. I'm sure every one of them did. "

2006-10-03 16:58:09 · update #3

And here's the best one from
suspendor:

"Hey, if it's okay for democrats, why not republicans?
Simple case of the pot calling the kettle black."

2006-10-03 17:00:37 · update #4

10 answers

I agree. Mark Foley is at best a CHILD PREDATOR!!!! He sent IM's to a young boy, using teenage vernacular (i.e Cool, broken English etc.) to coerce a young boy into engaging into sexual conversation. If I were hunting rabbit I'd bait my trap with carrots because that's what rabbits like. Sexual predators say, do, and use things that their prey like. He's (Mark Foley) using every excuse in the book and not taking full responsibility for his actions. He checked into a rehab center for Alcoholisim, not sexual perversion! Since when does AA treat sexually deviant behavior? I'm totally disgusted by these events. Maybe he should sign up for being the head of N.A.A.M.B.L.A., that seems more his speed!

2006-10-03 17:12:29 · answer #1 · answered by Nicolle D 1 · 2 0

In the 1983 scandal, there used to be an perpetrator from every celebration, and Newt Gingrich demanded that they be eliminated from workplace. My query is, should you consider that Foley will have to be reprimanded additional, why wasn't that equal movement taken towards the opposite 2 politicians who admittedly did greater than they're pronouncing that Foley did. I'm no longer condoning what Foley did, I'm simply pronouncing that any sexual misconduct will have to be treated within the equal procedure. Can you furnish a few examples of individuals who had been protecting him? If they had been, I'd like to grasp precisely what it used to be that they stated. Edit: I ask for rationalization and also you slander my title? Excuse me, however you rather will have to consider earlier than you act. All I requested is what the humans you're relating to stated to protect him. I'm no longer even pronouncing that they did not. You have undoubtedly no groundwork for pronouncing that I "love Foley". It could be great should you could behave as should you had been older than four years of age.

2016-08-29 08:14:37 · answer #2 · answered by kernan 4 · 0 0

Hey Rush is leading the charge of the conservative faithful. Rush basically suggested Liberals are upset because we couldn't join in the fun. Mr. Viagra speaks and they all sit up and listen.

The funny thing is that Foley has already resigned and we can now move on, but the conservatives will try to turn the whole Foley thing into a Liberal plot to disrupt the November elections.

I'm betting they will be talking about Foley long after we Liberals have moved on to more important issues.

2006-10-03 16:56:32 · answer #3 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 4 1

I have not heard or read anyone defending Foley or his actions, although a man is innocent till proved guilt so someone may have. You go by the all men are guilty unless proved innocent or are Republican then they are always guilty.
I have heard some question why someone saves IMs for 3 yrs & releases 2 months before an election. These were embarassing emails according to his family & this is a seat that goes Republican 95% of the time.
Foley resigned, not Republican problem - a DA's problem.
As a mother, I hope they prosecute him to the full extent of law.

I also hope they find out who held such damaging to pages information until it helped the Democrats the most. 3 newspapers were sent emails by Republicans in 2005 & all including Miami Herald did not find them of value. The truly perverse ones were not given to Republican leaders. Makes you go HUMMMM!

For Info - you keep mentioning Rush - I listen to classical music never Rush & I think for myself, can you?

2006-10-03 17:02:09 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1 1

If you leave the party lines out of it and say remove all these sick people from power, I'll agree! I said so when Slick Willy Clinton was violating sexual harrassment laws and getting a BJ in a government building by a government intern paid by taxpayers' dollars! ALL these sick perverted people need to be removed, including Foley!

2006-10-03 16:53:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Give quotes.....I have not heard ANYTHING but condemnation for Foley from the Rep's....Change the batteries in your hearing aid....or clean the wax outta your ears...you aren't listening



Years ago? Give me a break??? Once it was known he was out...unlike Some Dems who still have a seat on congress...but I guess that is OK, right?


Quotes from party members...the ignorant blathering from someone in an online forum hardly constitutes as 'credible'.

2006-10-03 16:51:09 · answer #6 · answered by CrazyCatLady 4 · 2 2

Rush 'tub-o-crap' Limbaugh even went as far as to say the Dems set Foley up! As for the 'Dems are pervs' rebuttal, it kind of reminds me of the inane volley of insults kids hurl at one another on playgrounds.

2006-10-03 16:54:25 · answer #7 · answered by tiko 4 · 2 2

Dude--ya know I thought I didn't see you at Jesus Camp last summer!! By the way CrazyCat---sure your hearing condemnation now, but where was it years ago when his buddies knew about his problem and failed to keep it covered up?

2006-10-03 16:52:01 · answer #8 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1 1

okay you say Foley is innocent yet he said he is not

2006-10-03 17:08:06 · answer #9 · answered by blue_eyed_southernman 4 · 0 0

if youll take that in the ear youll take it in the rear

2006-10-03 16:52:03 · answer #10 · answered by dpjrocheleau 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers