If a person could lead this country in a very positive and un corrupt manner would any in the USA vote him in

Question

if he was not on the left or the right side, turning his back on all who where unjust and corrupt,doing only good for all in this country,and keeping out ,of all other countrys affairs ,would this person feel welcome by americans to lead them into a more stable future, what are your thoughts on change, not more of the same stuff but real change, clip the wings of politics once and for all, what do you think? be nice on the answers please.

not asking if a party would approve,asking would the american people,they are in charge not any party of corrupt controlers, thats what should change the unlawful underhanded control of everything .

I AM READY WHEN YOU ARE.

I can clearly see that most feel we are no longer in control of our country,and to vote helps nothing true? well tell me why nothing is being done about it? pass the word on , put me in and all things from that moment will be by national vote on every thing,our tax money will be for schools- med-for only the ones who can't pay for it, and all who can work must, support the usa and no other countrys, the time is now, will you do this for the kids will you do this for all of us, remember the basics that made this country not the crazy politics that are destroying it now, change it , .

Answer 1

In order to do everything you're talking about, this person would need to suck the economy dry, lol, if he has the money, he has the power, it would call for some one with a history in law, and law enforcement because the justice system is screwed up beyond repair the way the system is now, and he would have to change that immidiately, then he could start on other issues, like healthcare reform, schools, amd getting rid of some of the pain in the *** laws that the average american don't even know they exist. and yes, it will work this way, and he will succeed.

Answer 2

That's approximately the dumbest declaration (query?) I've ever obvious. It's nearly humorous. How can Obama be the sector's finest chief while he has by no means been a chief of whatever? I suppose the racism bit has regularly performed out, do not you? Oh, you do not suppose, do you? You simply sit down there for your little daze and suppose that you're status on the podium creating a speech at the same time ladies faint and others cheer. Don't child your self, child. The fainting is triggered via your odor and the cheering is a reaction to an declaration that you are leaving.

Answer 3

Politic and corruptions are hand maidens to one another.

The purpose and directive given us the citizens is to be the vanguard of liberty. The statement that clearly defines our responsibility some 230 years ago is this:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Answer 4

I'd hate to burst your bubble, but unless a person is corrupt and makes a lot of promises to people who have tons of money for his election campaign, he will never even come close. Without huge amounts of money, you will never get elected. You won't have the TV time, you cannot compete with the billions of dollars spent by the republicans and democrats to have their people elected. There are a lot of people with good ideas that run for president, or other positions, but without the dough, you'll never hear about them.

Answer 5

this crazy place we call the land of the free and the home of the brave are all for controversy. And if we found such a person, people in politics would try their hardest to find something on the person and even create lies.

Answer 6

they all lied to get where they are....so will the next one....i refuse to spend my time in voting lines anymore...with all the corrupted voting scandals...it doesn't matter whom you vote for...the Gov...picks who they want....even when they are elected...there are so many other things left from the last president...they have no just in trying to take care the little things they promised when asking for your vote.....I did not vote for BUSH......

Answer 7

They would not have the opportunity becuase neither party would nominate such a person.

Answer 8

No. We can't vote for someone better than us.