English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Congress gives the president the authority to jail anyone he wants for as long as he wants without even bringing charges. We must challenge this mad and increasingly dangerous man. The Busheviks are using fear and propaganda to reshape our national values to serve their craven political purposes and addiction to power.

2006-10-03 16:38:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Scuba: Habeas Corpus.

2006-10-03 16:41:24 · update #1

To I vote : Truth is sometimes painful. If Congress can give the president the sole authority to define and detain an "unlawful enemy combatant" indefinitely, who's next? - This applies to any one in the US. Possibly even you.

2006-10-03 16:57:24 · update #2

10 answers

Conservatives and the religious right want to destroy the real America and replace it with a Theocratic government based on the evil morality of their rape-torture-kill Christian God (or, as John Adams said, they want to, “"whip and crop, and pillory and roast.")

America was founded as a secular democratic republic. By unanimous approval of the 1797 U.S. Congress:

“As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion”

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/barbary/bar1796t.htm

This is hardly the first time Christians have tried to undermine the government and overthrow the country. In 1864, 1874, 1896 and 1911, they tried to pass amendments that would rewrite the Constitution to include references to God. Furthermore, there has never been a time in the history of Christianity when it had political power and did not use it for evil purposes.

And today’s Christian terrorists wish America harm as well. On 9/11 both Falwell And Robertson said that God had brought down the trade towers and killed 3,000 because he was angry with America and that we deserved it because we had brought it on ourselves. Of course, on 9/12 they began denying it when it became clear that most Americans were not in the mood for that kind of talk.

We will never know if Adams was right when he wrote,” This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!”, because we likely we never find out.

But we do know that if the Christian religious-right gains control of America, then only terrorists will control the world. How can deal with Islamic terrorists abroad when we have Christian terrorist traitors at home?.

JOHN ADAMS: “How has it happened that millions of myths, fables, legends and tales have been blended with Jewish and Christian fables and myths and have made them the most bloody religion that has ever existed? Filled with the sordid and detestable purposes of superstition and fraud?” (Letters to F.A. Van Der Kamp 1809-1816)

THOMAS JEFFERSON: I join you [John Adams], therefore, in sincere congratulations that this den of the priesthood is at length broken up, and that a Protestant Popedom is no longer to disgrace the American history and character.”

“In every country and in every age the priest [any and every clergyman] has been hostile to liberty; he is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.”

“I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition [Christianity] one redeeming feature. They are all alike, founded upon fables and mythologies.”

“His [Calvin's] religion was demonism. If ever man worshiped a false God, he did.”

“Their [Presbyterian’s] ambition and tyranny would tolerate no rival if they had power.”

JAMES MADISON: Christianity neither is, nor ever was apart of the common law. Feb. 10, 1814

The establishment of the chaplainship to Cong[res]s is a palpable violation of equal rights, as well as of Constitutional principles: The tenets of the chaplains elected [by the majority] shut the door of worship agst the members whose creeds & consciences forbid a participation in that of the majority.”

BEN FRANKLIN: Some volumes against Deism fell into my hands. They were said to be the substance of sermons preached at Boyle’s Lecture. It happened that they produced on me an effect precisely the reverse of what was intended by the writers; for the arguments of the Deists, which were cited in order to be refuted, appealed to me much more forcibly than the refutation itself. In a word, I soon became a thorough Deist.”

JOHN TYLER: “The United States have adventured upon a great and noble experiment, which is believed to have been hazarded in the absence of all previous precedent -- that of total separation of Church and State. (letter dated July 10, 1843)

ABRAHAM LINCOLN: “My earlier views of the unsoundness of the Christian scheme of salvationand the human origin of the scriptures, have become clearer and stronger with advancing years and I see no reason for thinking I shall ever change them.” (to Judge JS. Wakefield, after Willie Lincoln's death)

MARY TODD LINCOLN: “Mr. Lincoln was not a Christian.”

ULYSSES S. GRANT: “Leave the matter of religion to the family altar, the church and the private school supported entirely by private contributions. Keep the church and state forever separate.” (Address to the Army of the Tennessee, Des Moines, Iowa,

2006-10-03 16:42:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I would check out several of the sites on the net concerning soveriegnty. Your constitutional rights have already been under attack for longer than most of us have been around. You could start your search by understanding the difference between "Common Law" and "UCC Law". Your rights under Common Law or Constitutional Law were nearly done away with in 1933 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt "sold" the country and all inhabitants into a "virtual slavery" to the International bankers by instituting the Uniform Commercial Code. UCC now regulates every facet of your daily life. If you don't beleive this just get a jeweler's magnifying eyepeice and check out the line on the front of your personal checks where you sign your name. You are blindly led into contract every time you sign your name without knowing exactly what every word on whatever document you are signing "means". Before signing anything make sure you look up every word in Black's Legal Dictionary. If you want to challenge the authority, you must first remedy all instances where you unknowingly gave "consent" which gives someone authority over you.

2006-10-03 17:04:56 · answer #2 · answered by robert k 1 · 0 0

yes yes yes, but, don't stop with bush go to the supreme court and our congress , senate, etc, our constitutional rights are being eroded daily by different scum bags including G,W,B, and has been by almost every political and judicial scum bag elected or appointed in the country, the only reason I can see for it is they are getting paid some serious money under the table or ??? and stupid enough to not realize that their children and future offspring will suffer the consequences .but most are not intelligent enough to realize that, just look at how our so called supreme court has ruled on our constitution over the last several years, and our congress and senate don't even bother to read a bill before they vote on it they just take the money and run, even if they read it they wouldn't know what it meant or the consequences it entailed
it should be a law that they had to read and understand a bill before they could vote on it , and there was a bill introduced into congress to that effect ,but, of course it was voted down, why???
our policitains couldn't make enough money for voting on bills they understood because half of them are like G,W,,B, and can't read,

2006-10-03 17:01:31 · answer #3 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 1 0

Wars always result in the rolling back of civil liberties. We usually get most back but a few dissapear for good. The war on terror is one of those long wars. So do I think our rights our under attack by the Bush Administration? No, I think we are trading our freedom for security. If we had screened the air passengers would 9/11 have happened? No. So we have three choices.

1)Do nothing and hope that terorists don't kill Americans
2)Sacrifice civil liberties for security
3)Or we can go after the terrorists, their countries, their families, their mosques, and anyone else that gives money, sympathy and hang them from crosses, burn their cities to the ground, pillage their oil, and salt the earth with their bones and tell anyone, who thinks of hurting one hair on one single American will have the same fate. Want your civil liberties back? Then its time to make terrorism so scary that terrorists mothers will kill them in their crib if they even think of laying a hand on me and mine.

2006-10-03 16:46:52 · answer #4 · answered by solitas777 3 · 1 0

Do you even know your constitutional rights?
It does not seem so, since you banter rights about that are
judicial rights,since constitutional rights only apply to Americans
not terrorist. No fear or propaganda need to reshape my values, I learned them from my parents & my love of studying goverment
which I learned from my Grandfather.
From you I learn bigotry & to be judgemental. President Bush can not be the root of every problem, we have always had problems & differences in politics.

2006-10-03 16:48:13 · answer #5 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 1

The closer we get to absolute power the farther we get from democracy.

2006-10-03 16:46:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If you think this is bad you should of seen what FDR and Turman did...go back an read abit....wow....Be careful what you think you know for you know not was is known.

2006-10-03 16:41:12 · answer #7 · answered by kickinupfunf 6 · 1 1

Any examples or just rhetoric?

2006-10-03 16:40:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No

2006-10-03 16:40:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

its called CONSFEARACY

2006-10-03 16:45:36 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers