Nobody denies that Foley is a perverted dirt bag. I dont understand how liberals talk out of both sides of their mouth. They fund and defend the rights of NAMBLA.
Doubt this? Read what the Associated Press has to say. How can an organiziation that publically admits to pedophilia be defended by liberals? Does this make sense?
Also, I realize that not ALL Democrats support this. Im not painting all Democrats as pedophiles so dont make that connection with Conservatives.
2006-10-03 16:11:46 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What is with you people? NAMBLA is North American Man Boy Love Association. And... Here is the link that I forgot to attach
2006-10-03 16:34:21 · update #1
http://www.gatago.com/seattle/politics/4635427.html
2006-10-03 16:34:39 · update #2
Just what I thought. You filthy flag burners cant offer a valid answer to a valid question. So typical....
2006-10-03 16:43:02 · update #3
Just what I thought. You filthy flag burners cant offer a valid answer to a valid question. So typical....
2006-10-03 16:43:10 · update #4
Just what I thought. You filthy flag burners cant offer a valid answer to a valid question. So typical....
2006-10-03 16:43:14 · update #5
smokescreen
dems are full of shiite, and are desperate to grab power again, this is all this is. holding on to the info till 5 weeks before an election. same old sleazy tricks.
2006-10-03 16:28:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Your pain is understandable, but Quit blaming Liberals and Democrats for Foley's shocking and disappointing behavior. Truth is, the Liberals and the Democrats were nowhere around, and in fact, weren't even told about it because Republicans leadership knew but refused to disclose his behavior for a year, even though they are mandated to do so. The world is questioning why.
You should try to accept that Foley and your Republican leadership are responsible for initiating and then perpetuating this illegal behavior. (not the people you think are your foes) You obsession with NAMBLA might make people feel sorry for you because NAMBLA supports homosexuals feeling good about themselves to have OPEN relationships. Nambla is not behind the SECRET sick Pedophiles you support.
Now it's time to ignore your repeated questions about this. Go read some good psychology books about pedophelia, about being brainwashed and about superiority complexes (because your party suffers from that) and go and get some help.
2006-10-03 16:29:43 · answer #2 · answered by Reba K 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hey hardartsystems: You want links? I'll find them for you.
(BTW, NAMBLA is the North American Man Boy Love Association.)
2006-10-03 16:47:49 · answer #3 · answered by Jay S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did Limbaugh mention NAMBLA on his show today or something? Usually that's the cause when we see the same question with no basis in fact repeated here about 50 times.
2006-10-03 16:40:52 · answer #4 · answered by JerH1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wut the hell's NAMBLA? Everyone knows many Dems and Reps an' Independents have all been involved in perverted acts, so whay are you trying to distract from this scumbag? That's the dummest thing I ever herd of--bring up other perverts/moslesters to defend a pervert/molester!
2006-10-03 16:29:34 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, that's the ticket - it's the liberals' fault that a republican wanted to have a re-pube-lickin party. And plus those liberals better shut up about it!!
2006-10-03 16:33:43 · answer #6 · answered by Mark Porter 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Someone has to defend Republicans.
2006-10-03 16:14:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No one is saying that all republicans are pedophiles. we are saying that the house leadership knew about Foley's antics for a long time yet did nothing.
2006-10-03 16:17:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
You are so childish this question isn't even worth answering. Have you been watching too much South Park lately?
2006-10-03 16:22:08 · answer #9 · answered by JR 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Name one federal official who defends NAMBLA, liberal or conservative.
2006-10-03 16:23:04 · answer #10 · answered by beren 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋