I can't believe you wasted your last question on that!
2006-10-03 15:21:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by TJMiler 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
u just wasted a question. It would actually be worse because a monkey is incapable of comprehending the human language. Therefore unable to commuicate with its cabinet members and decisions cannot be made.
I think what u wanna hear (if ur against Bush) is: it will be better.
2006-10-03 15:24:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by yellowskinnedguy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I cant believe u actually wasted ure time asking dat. of course a monkey is smarter and better than bush.
2006-10-03 15:25:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by agam 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say better. Some monkeys are known to be smart though.
2006-10-03 15:26:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They would stay the same, because the real person in power isn't Bush, it's his advisory team...now if they were all replaced by monkeys, we might start seeing some real changes...LOL!
2006-10-03 15:21:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by rita_alabama 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
what a stupid question. bush is worse then a monkey tho
why were u asking this question anyway?
2006-10-03 15:21:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, they sent a monkey in orbit and it did just fine.
but, i bet you'll never see bush going to orbit...they know he'll blow the damn ship up.
i'd vote for the monkey.
2006-10-03 15:23:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Praise the Lord 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Worse
2006-10-03 15:21:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
mmmm it would be fun and funny being ruled by a monkey
2006-10-03 15:24:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
regular monkey or flying monkey?
2006-10-03 15:22:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by medic 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
like omg! and you decided to waste your last question on this??? by the way,it would be wayyyyyy better
2006-10-03 15:27:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by ♥D@t_bLaSiaN♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋