decide?
everyone already agrees that taking 90% off 90% of people and giving it to 1% is wrong, unjust, extremely dangerous, madness, infinitely stupid - so humanity has some notion of justice that differs enormously from the current practice or state of things [90% get paid 10th - 1000th of world av hrly pay, another 9% get paid 1th - 10th of world av hrly pay]
can the general human notion of justice in pay be determined with sufficient accuracy, and practised, which must minimise anger at overpay/underpay, and thus minimise violence [war and crime]
the market is extremely unjust - everyone acknowledges this in admitting the rich get richer and the poor get poorer - i dont think anyone can argue that pay from $1 to $1 billion a fortnight's work - from a 1000th to a million times average - is anything but extremely far from the general human idea of justice in pay
therefore change is needed and the only correct change is a change closer to what the people think of as just
2006-10-03
15:08:32
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Economics