Foley has admitted that he's gay. (I wasn't surprised, he was feminine before this scandal.)
But anyway, it seems like he's trying to make "being gay" as an excuse for his actions. Does this mean he's trying to demonize gay people as molesters? Is he trying to give gay people a bad name? I bet you, most homosexuals out there does not appreciate Foley for saying that being gay is an excuse.
2006-10-03 14:00:55 · 14 answers · asked by dewdropinn 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Actually, he checked into a Rehab clinic so he can blame alcohol. He never blamed being gay. That's ridiculous.
2006-10-03 14:02:13 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Name me one person who gets in trouble who does not have 101 good reasons for doing it.So far he has blamed booze & being molested as a teen himself by a clergymen.Niether one to me makes what he did all right.As for him being Gay that is not a excuse for his actions.As of now the only thing he did was send some e-mails he had no business sending to a minor child. There is no proof that he had any contact with the page except for the e-mails.Lets waituntil the FBI completes the case then judge him.Also to who had pity for his wife , he is not married.
2006-10-03 14:31:17 · answer #2 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He’s giving Republicans and the Catholic Church a bad call (nicely…ok…he's making their already undesirable names worse) no longer homosexuals. Didn’t you pay attention Foley’s lawyer this afternoon? Now, the mouthpiece assures us that Foley isn't using this as an excuse yet: he replaced into raped by using Priest as a baby. Why are maximum of Republicans and Catholics pedophiles? Why does the management of the two agencies tolerate it? Do they actually condone it? It’s commencing to appear like it. I knew they the two worshipped a rape-torture-kill God and desire to break usa of america by using putting the ideals of their evil God into the U. S. shape the place it does not belong, yet I didn’t comprehend pedophilia replaced right into a referred to as a sacred act.
2016-10-18 10:52:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did not know foley was gay. most molesters are straight, research has shown this time after time. I think he is trying to excuse his behavior by alledging he was molested by a former priest
2006-10-03 14:05:31 · answer #4 · answered by manpsych 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he is an a$$. He is looking for any excuse for what he did and there is none. He is a sick man, period. It does not matter if he is gay, straight, alkie, crackhead. You can take all those things away and he would still be a sicko. He sould be thrown under the prison.
2006-10-03 14:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by thesweetestthings24 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep, you are sooooooooooo right. Poor Foley and Mrs Foley
2006-10-03 14:04:14 · answer #6 · answered by Sugar 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
uhhh... no... the people that saved this stuff for 3 years then make a scandal out of it may be trying to give gays a bad name..
2006-10-03 14:07:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i thank that foley is trying to give gay people
a bad name im not surprised ether
2006-10-03 14:05:09 · answer #8 · answered by robert w. b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that he gives sex abuse victims a bad name. He's claiming a priet molested him. Although i know that i should reserve my judgement, i think it''s merely a bastardized attempt to improve his image, and it's a smokescreen so that the public won't thinkabout the boys that he psychologically raped.
2006-10-03 14:37:20 · answer #9 · answered by fachizzzzle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he is trying to give anyone a bad name. He got caught and is in deep deep regret. He needs lots of professional help.
2006-10-03 14:04:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋