He is scum,he is gone and we have elections to win.There is no way I will let this late date release side track the issues of the election.Will you?
2006-10-03 13:34:52 · 12 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No I don't care now he is gone but the Dems accused of similar or worse are still in their seats. If the Republicans knew about him so did the Democrats, it is all just political smear tactics used by the Democrats or they would have said something earlier. they are going to step in it and won't be able to scrape it off their shoes or get rid of the smell of their crap tactics.
2006-10-03 13:39:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The issue is not just what Foley did, but what did Hastert and the rest of the Gop leadership do or not do. Apparently Hastert and the GOP leaders knew that he was doing this for possibly years and had not only allowed it to go on, but allowed Foley to chair the Exploited Children committee!?!?! Talk about a lack of leadership. The entire GOP leadership of the House needs to be thrown into jail for aiding and abetting a felon.
And Dems are not slaughtering Foley for being " Gay" as someone stated here. Gays are not pedophiles. Pedophilia is something entirely different and can be straight also.
2006-10-03 14:17:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are right. this is not a political issue. it is a legal and Moral issue. let the law handle it and the church. politics should not concern itself with these types of moral issues ( wait, are you a liberal/ you sound like one.)
SUDDENLY the republicans do not want moral issues or religious issues to concern or affect politics. that is refreshing.
BUT WAIT... I heard the congress is a political body and the page system is part of the congress and the molester is a cngressmean so maybe there are some proper political considerations. wwas the hosue majority and other eladers doing their jobs well as elected to do when they allowed this to go on uninvestigated for a year or more after getting the word that a congressman that they knew was gay, and they knew his constituents did NOT know he was gay, was being "too friendly" with a mail page and breaking rules. THIS IS POLITICAL, because of that. we elect our leaders to do a job and if they do not do it right it is a political issue. sorry
2006-10-03 13:40:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Church knew that James' letter replace into inspired and placed it interior the canon, with the different letter God inspired to make up the Bible as all of us comprehend it. the entire Bible is FOR the Church yet numerous that's no longer written TO the Church, except you nonetheless sacrifice beasts on alters. you could desire to Rightly Divide the word of God. The e book of James isn't Church doctrine. We use it, yet no longer for doctrinal applications. Take this verse as an occasion. James 2:24 'Ye see then how that by skill of works a guy is justified, and not by skill of religion in easy terms.' is this authentic for the Church? Paul is the apostle to the Church. Romans to Philemon IS Church Doctrine. evaluate this verse with the single from James. Romans 3:28 subsequently we end that a guy is justified by skill of religion without the deeds of the regulation. to be certain who James letter is addressed to, in simple terms study the 1st verse. James a million:a million 'James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes that are scattered overseas, greeting.' that's directed to THE TWELVE TRIBES. no longer the Church. Are you analyzing somebody else's mail and doctrinally utilising it to your self? James would be doctrinally perfect in the process the Tribulation whilst Justification will require works alongside with faith.
2016-12-12 20:03:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. Republicans are not likely to be swayed by this incident. It's the Dems that are suddenly offended. Apparently, if you're a Republican you have to live to higher standard then the Democrats do. That translates to me (a independent) that as long as you admit you have no standards you don't have to do the right thing. True as that may be, I will not vote for a party with no standards.
2006-10-03 13:50:32 · answer #5 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. Not beyond pointing out the hypocrisy of the democrats.
We should never be afraid of cleaning house.
The day politics becomes more important than doing the right thing is the day politics will no longer matter...
2006-10-03 13:42:23 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO and I'm about one of the strongest Republicans out there.
When my silly friends question me about why we are in Iraq, I tell them because that we are there to fight terrorism darn it!
Of course they ask me the tough questions if I know anyone that is actually in Iraq and they seem to think my argument is somehow diminished because no one of my group would ever end up there. Still, we have people dying there (but no one I know, so what) and therefore our cause is just!
Ok, now as for the pedophile. I say so what! We are the party of compassionate conservatives. So one of our guys took that to apply to dudes under the age of consent. Again, I say so what? We are the party of right! And if people don't believe it, I say let's find a way to send them to fight our just wars for us!
See you at the club!!!
2006-10-03 13:46:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Not at all. I do find it funny that the democrats are slaughtering the guy for being gay. A gay that would rather be a republican than associated with the democridiots.
2006-10-03 13:46:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
well if your gay then your scum anyway, republican or democrat, get out of my country, who cares about foley, just something else liberals can run their mouth about like always
2006-10-03 13:41:08 · answer #9 · answered by donkeykong1122 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it is a HUGE issue to the republican base, the evangelical right...unless they turn hypocrite like hastert...after all, 'character matters'...right? right?????
2006-10-03 13:50:02 · answer #10 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋