English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

I understand your question perfectly, and the wording of your question suggests that you understand correctly that a light year is a measure of distance, rather than a measure of time.

The problem would arise if someone claimed that a visible area in deep space is 78 billion light years away, because there has not been enough time for light to travel that far.

Fortunately, there is a simple answer, and that is that the Hubble Deep Field has been estimated to be about 12 billion miles away. The figure of 78 billion years is spurious, and you can ignore it.

Get some sleep.

2006-10-03 14:27:22 · answer #1 · answered by aviophage 7 · 2 1

The universe is a finite entity,it has a initiating and an end. each and everything began interior an identical place. A galaxy a million billion gentle years away had to circulate there,bobbing up,then it rather is gentle had to return back for a million billion years. The Hubble deep container pictures teach galaxies 13.5 billion gentle years away. those galaxies do not exist now. A galaxy is an end degree interior the evolution of the universe,as they advance a galactic middle,area is processed such that a purple shift is generated. If this purple shift is interpreted incorrectly it would point out a universe lots bigger and older than it rather is. The milky way is a sturdy occasion. The galactic middle isn't inhabited by potential of a black hollow,it rather is pushed by potential of a few style of neutron celeb activity. in case you will desire to view our galaxy from any course,you will possibly word a purple shift indicating it became into accelerating away. this could be an identical for an observer on the two ingredient. this might clarify why the outer hands rotate locked in line with the galactic middle. it would additionally clarify why darkish count isn't needed to end the hands from flying off. The universe isn't a chaotic entity even nonetheless it would be if it had no shrink to it rather is length. A chaotic universe would desire to not even come to an end.

2016-10-15 11:57:53 · answer #2 · answered by johannah 4 · 0 0

I've never heard of the hubble field be 78 billion light years away, I think that would be impossible in a universe no older than 15 billion years. The Hubble in effect is seeing back in time, since the light it sees begun to shine its light 15 billion years ago. If you would like to know the distance a light year its a simple equation, The speed of light is about 186000 miles per second ( in a vacume ), so multiply that by 60, than 60, than 24, than 365.

2006-10-03 14:06:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You are absolutely correct - there is no way we could see something 78 billion light-years away from us, because its light would not have had enough time to reach us yet. As a couple other people said, the farthest galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field are about 12 billion light-years away. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_deep_field

2006-10-03 15:55:39 · answer #4 · answered by kris 6 · 0 0

Don't forget that the object that emitted the light 14 billion years ago has been moving away from us for 14 billion years. They think. Scientists have estimated that the universe now actually over 150 billion light years across.

2006-10-03 16:03:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As the universe expands, more distant objects recede from the Earth faster, in what is called the Hubble Flow. The light from very distant galaxies is significantly affected by doppler shifting, which reddens the radiation that we receive from them. While quasars with high redshifts were known, very few galaxies with redshifts greater than 1 were known before the Hubble Deep Field (HDF) images were produced. The HDF, however, contained many galaxies with redshifts as high as 6, corresponding to distances of about 12 billion light years. (Due to redshift the most distant objects in the HDF are not actually visible in the Hubble images; they can only be detected in images of the HDF taken at longer wavelengths by ground-based telescopes.)

2006-10-03 13:45:49 · answer #6 · answered by Polo 7 · 0 1

You got this from YOUTUBE, right?

NOTE - YouTube is, for the most part, JUNK.

Parts talk about 78 Million - NOT 78 Billion !!!!

No SCIENTIST has ever said the universe is 78 Billion years old.

Is it 78B LY in SIZE? We will never know.

In the Hubble Deep Field, there are STARS billions of years away, Galaxies billions away, but NO ONE has EVER claimed objects in the picture are 78 B LY away.

2006-10-03 14:01:11 · answer #7 · answered by singbloger1953a 3 · 3 2

A light year, and our perception of a year are two different things. For example, a year (earth) is what the universe is measured in. It is the amount of time it takes for the earth to rotate around the sun. So, in theory, 14 billion cycles around the sun ago, the universe came into existance. A light year however, is how far light can travel in a year. So it is a measure of distance, not time.

2006-10-03 13:38:45 · answer #8 · answered by chris m 5 · 1 2

What possible reference point is there to decide there have been 14 billion years? What human observation could even remotely approximate the smallest fraction of 14 billion years? What a load!

2006-10-03 14:53:06 · answer #9 · answered by rockEsquirrel 5 · 0 2

Years is an amount of time, while light years is an amount of space. Besides the universe can only be 10,000 or less years old. Even evolutionists have declared it to be in this range. But because it would show that a mighty Creator exists, they decide to say 'no, the earth is more like 75 billion years old.'

2006-10-03 13:48:43 · answer #10 · answered by charity 2 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers