English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For anyone good at math, lets see who can figure this out.

^- denotes to the power of.

X^n+Y^n=Z^n

Good luck!

2006-10-03 13:16:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

10 answers

X^n + Y ^n = Z ^n for n>2 (1630)

It's the last Fermat's conjecture. In 1993, Andrew Wiles proved this conjecture. After that, Fermat's conjecture will become
Fermat's theorem.

2006-10-03 13:54:29 · answer #1 · answered by frank 7 · 1 0

10 + 2 ( 3 + 2x ) = 0 because your purpose is to locate x, you want to isolate x. In different words, you want your very last step to be in this sort: " x = __ " therefore, you should convey each and every thing that could no longer x to the different fringe of the equation. You attempt this in steps. the first step might want to be to subtract 10 on both area because you want to ultimately isolate x. 10 + 2 ( 3 + 2x ) = 0 (subtract 10 on both area) 2 ( 3 + 2x ) = -10 Now, you've a call. you could pick to distribute both over the parenthesis (meaning multiply it out). that is with regard to the Distributive resources, the position A(B+C) = A*B + A*C. you actually have the alternative of no longer multiplying it out. Does it sound complicated? in case you pick to distribute, then it is going to seem as if this: 2 ( 3 + 2x ) = -10 2*3 + 2*2x = -10 next, you multiply. 6 + 4x = -10 Then, you subtract 6 from both area as a fashion to convey 6 faraway from the x. 4x = -10 - 6 4x = -16 ultimately, you divide both area through 4. x = -4 that is your very last answer. ***yet continually ensure that you do examine your paintings! What in case you chosen to no longer distribute? this can be a extra effective way of fixing the challenge because it saves you a step. What I recommend is: 2 ( 3 + 2x ) = -10 even with is written interior a pair of parenthesis is secure through the parenthesis.. In different words, we may be able to divide both area through 2 to simplify the equation. 2 ( 3 + 2x ) = -10 Divide both area through 2 3 + 2x = -5 Then, you subtract 3 on both area to get the three faraway from the x. 2x = -8 Divide both area through 2 to isolate x. x = -4 You get a similar answer. Your very last answer is x = -4 wish it helps!

2016-12-04 04:40:10 · answer #2 · answered by reeves 4 · 0 0

One example could be

6^2 + 8^2 = 10^2

36+64=100

2006-10-03 13:25:00 · answer #3 · answered by MollyMAM 6 · 0 0

Looks a lot like A squared + Bsquared = Csquared...a common equation in, I think, geometry........

2006-10-03 13:21:02 · answer #4 · answered by KnowALittleBit 2 · 1 0

how about:
x=3
y=4
z=5
n=2
The real question is, are there any solutions such that n>2 and x, y, and z are all integers greater than 1.

2006-10-03 13:38:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

X = 4
Y = 5
Z = 6
n = 2

2006-10-03 13:24:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

change the variables name and write

a2 +b2 =c2 its a variant of pythagoras theorem

2006-10-03 13:34:54 · answer #7 · answered by robert m 2 · 0 0

Yeah...Fermat's last thrm. Big deal. Old news my friend.

2006-10-03 13:27:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

are you sure all the data is this?

2006-10-03 13:25:49 · answer #9 · answered by system_founder 1 · 0 0

im sorry..i thoughtt i would do this.... i study philosophy..thats not my fault... ;D

2006-10-03 13:22:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers