no..like unless the substance changes its state..even then its mass won't change..just the state in which ithe substance was earlier would reduce in mass (for example, when you boil water)..the rest of it would diffuse into the air (etc...)
2006-10-03 13:16:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rollester 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends on how much heat. If it is a low temperature, then the mass changes only on a level so small that it does not really matter, but if you bring it to a heat were the matter starts breaking down, then the mass will change. The mass is still there, but it is now just a bunch of little particles floating around.
2006-10-03 13:16:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by DanMan 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Technically, matter never loses or gains mass during chemical changes. However, it may seem like some of the mass is "lost" due to evaporation. In a chemical reaction, the mass of the reactants must equal the mass of the products.
2006-10-03 13:20:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by brainster 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
From E=Mc squared since c is constant (always) E=M(constant) and E - Energy and energy can not be created or destroyed (ever) Mass does not change if you heat it. Some of the mass may alter to a vapor state but mass of the system remains constant.
2006-10-03 13:18:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO. i do no longer know what baby of classes Nick is taking, yet mass is often an identical. If temperature decreases, the quantity could shrink, on account that debris are closer, yet no longer mass.
2016-12-12 20:02:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but if any of it evaporates, then part of the mass will go into the air, so the main blob of mass might "lose" mass.
2006-10-03 13:14:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by PJ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as there is no change in phase then no lose in mass.
2006-10-03 13:17:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Cheminator 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but the volume changes.
2006-10-04 02:56:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Barret 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, some of them can be evaporated in the air as a gas
2006-10-03 13:13:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by jim k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because it creates less density
2006-10-03 13:16:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kathy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋