we totally ignored the need for transportation, as well as the cost of fuel?
2006-10-03 13:03:14 · 4 answers · asked by Zelda Hunter 7 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Other - Cars & Transportation
That's my philosophy! So I buy the most powerful fast thing that uses more hydrocarbon than a empty city bus. My choice last time was the 2006 Pontiac GTO 6.0 liter six speed 400 horsepower and 400 lb-ft torque. And was pleasantly surprised when it got 25 miles a gallon on the highway. Fun factor and how great you look in your new car is all that really matters to make $420 month car payments. I don't know how people can make payments on a 30 thousand dollar slow Toyota Prius when I go roaring past blowing the tree hugger into the ditch. After the Democrats get into power you can have only 2,500 carbon credits monthly. And your house uses up 1,500 carbon credits. Get ready the motor scooter and bicycles. Just RANT!
2006-10-03 13:22:34 · answer #1 · answered by John Paul 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course they would! I think most of our concerns in driving or riding in cars is the cost of fuel.
2006-10-03 20:11:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd have a miata, if I could fit in one and use everyday,
6' tall live in Maine
2006-10-03 20:24:30 · answer #3 · answered by M B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that way every time Idrive my 1965 volkswagon.
2006-10-03 20:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by vwjessie69 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋