USB is faster than parallel, but Ethernet is faster still.
2006-10-03 12:53:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by cptdrinian 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Below is a comparison of speeds of different technologies, from slowest to fastest. Please note that these are theoretical maximum throughputs of the different technology.
Technology Theoretical Maximum Throughput
Apple Desktop Bus (ADB) 0.01 Mbps or 10 Kbps
Serial Port 0.23 Mbps or 230 Kbps
Geoport Port 2 Mbps
USB 1.1 at low data transfer rate 1.5 Mbps
USB 1.1 at high data transfer rate 12 Mbps
FireWire 400 400 Mbps
SCSI 1-40 MB/sec
Fast SCSI 8-80 MB/sec
Ultra SCSI-3 18-160 MB/sec
USB 2.0 at high data transfer rate 480 Mbps
FireWire 800 at 800 Mbps 800 Mbps
2006-10-03 13:11:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by ladeehwk 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
parallel ports is old style transfer ports, and usb 1 and usb 2 is the new transfer ports, so by definition the new usb ports are faster
2006-10-03 13:23:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by scotgirl55 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope... by skill of it really is totally nature, usb is way slower than firewire. it really is better known. hence the former VHS/Betamax arguements from years in the past. if you're utilizing a USB hub it truly is non-powered, often times those are operating at a million.a million usb ranges, truly than 2.0.
2016-11-26 01:23:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by bastien 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
usb 2 is much more faster than parallel.
2006-10-03 12:50:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No contest - USB 1 & 2 are faster.
2006-10-03 12:47:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by singbloger1953a 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
parallel interface is more faster coz it can transfer 500 kb to 2.0mdgabytes and usb can transfer 1.5mb.
2006-10-03 12:53:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by one_man_show_14 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
USB2.0... 400mb/s transfer..... parallel only KB.....old OLD technolgy
2006-10-03 14:47:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Andrew R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
USB by a mile....
2006-10-03 12:46:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Fremen 6
·
0⤊
0⤋