This question goes to show how stupid you repubs are being a pedophile is not the same as being gay. Being gay is not against the law being a pedophile is. You can be and adult male and molest a young girl and that makes you a pedophile not gay.
2006-10-03 11:48:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by region50 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
A) if republicans supported gay rights they would most definitely not be the perfect party--they have so much wrong with them that I won't even try to list the items here.
B) if Foley were a Democrat, I doubt things would be much different although Republicans would be getting on line to join a lynching party just now. The problem is not that he is/is not gay, the problem is that he was hitting on a 16 year old and other pages of the same age bracket. In most places that's under age and constitutes a crime. Also, you have to realize that pages often are away from their families and homes and regular schools--that makes them more vulnerable and congressmen are in a position to exploit those vulnerabilities--usually having money, some immunities, ability to move more freely and access to pages.
C) The scandal is deeper than just one congressman and that 's adding fuel to the fire here. Apparently, people who are supposed to be watching out for this kind of behavior were tipped off about it sometime ago and did nothing. That's part of this outrage--it sort of resembles various Catholic Bishops who looked the other way while their priests abused altar boys and little girls. They became active co-conspirators when they knew this was going on and did nothing about it, when they were in the position to and were obligated to act.
D) The only thing I can say that would be somewhat in defense of the whole affair, is that from what I read so far, the comments Foley made were less than "lurid" as they have been described and the page may have been leading him on and not so innocent himself. As for the leadership they are saying that nothing explicit was brought to their attention, just that the communications were overly friendly, but nothing more. So, it is perhaps possible to give the benefit of the doubt to Foley (only a little bit) that he had a willing participant and to the Leadership (perhaps a lot) that they had no inkling that the problem was as bad as its turning out.
2006-10-03 11:51:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by William E 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes, if Foley was a Democrat, the News Media and the Democrat Party would be calling him a hero and a pioneer in Man/Boy Sex.
IT WOULD BE A BIG PARTY AND LOVE FEST.
The Democrat Party considers Clinton, Studds, Frank, and all the Kennedys as Sexual Revolution Heroes.
Even the Now gang and feminists Cheered whenever Clinton attacked or groped a girl.
2006-10-03 11:49:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Republicans are not anti gay rights. We support equal rights for all. All gays have a right to a fair trial, right to start a business, right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of property. What are you referring to? They can go where any other citizen can go.
What "Gay Rights" people want is special laws just for gays. They want gay marriage, but in a democratic society like ours, it must be passed by the legislature. Since 80% of Americans are against gay marriage, that is not going to happen. "Gay rights" also include harsher sentences for gay bashing. All this is is treating gays like more important people. Murder is murder. It is not a worse crime because the person was gay, black, etc.
As for the democrats, politics takes over at this point. Since they have nothing positive to offer, they slander Foley. This is typical of both parties. Focus on ideas and direction, not spats about this and that.
2006-10-03 11:52:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Both parties are loaded with perverts, but it is the Democratic party that supports every deviant life style you can think of. If this was a democrat their would be no story unless a Republican was setting on the story for three years, like the Democrats did, this smells like a set up to me they waited until the up coming election to let this out. Democrats the party of Pedophiles. This says it all.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16450
2006-10-03 11:56:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by hexa 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
jointly as the republicans wanting to be the gadget of the vast wealthy it grew to become a cope with the devil. Then all that they had from that ingredient have been the lies - each and every little ingredient grew to become a lie - "sparkling Skies Initiative" - "healthful wooded area Initiative" - "No White toddler Left at the back of" - "conflict on Terror". each and every little ingredient grew to become a cynical lie. The republicans have been in a position to cover this actuality at the back of a wall of propaganda until finally is have been given here to bushy - he's so stupid he could no longer cover up for a manner crooked he grew to become. So particular - bushy located the republicans out of corporation. And in the event that they get "elected" back, it rather is a genuine undesirable sign for this u . s ..
2016-10-18 10:43:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Republicans support human rights.
They dont care if your green, gay,or too stupid to ask a smart question.
They just dont believe the government should support any particular individual way of life, just cause that person doesnt want to be responsible for their own actions.
Its too bad Saphire is incapable of doing her own thinking or she would have said the same thing.
2006-10-03 11:48:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by scary g 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
What I find so funny is the democrats that are coming across like being gay is a horrible thing. LOL...The hypocrisy shines though again. The Gays would rather be republican that associated with the likes of the democrats.
2006-10-03 11:46:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
if foley was a democrat you would hear the same thing clinton said, what happens in the bedroom should stay in the bedroom, you have no right looking into peoples private lives
" that depends on wht your definition of is is"
2006-10-03 11:49:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Of course it would be different, there wouldn't be any negative media coverage,the democraps wouldn't be saying a thing, just like when their guy got caught.
We are the perfect party its just that there isn't perfect people.
2006-10-03 11:51:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋