English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is known that Iran does not yet have nuclear weapons. At the least it will be many years before they do.

"North Korean Missile Found In Alaska"
http://www.americanfreepress.net/03_17_03/North_Korean_Missile_/north_korean_missile_.html

The Bush administration is ignoring reports from South Korea and Japan that the North Koreans have test-fired a nuclear-capable, intercontinental ballistic missile, which landed in the state of Alaska.

The North Korean three-stage Taepo Dong 3 ICBM, which is, according to U.S. intelligence sources, capable of striking targets about 9,300 miles away.

Officially, as previously reported by American Free Press, the Pentagon admits that North Korea has only a two-stage Taepo Dong 2 missile, which CIA Director George J. Tenet indicates is capable of striking the U.S. West Coast, while the Taepo Dong 3 can strike targets anywhere in North America.

Does Iran have something we want? Why war with Iran and little talk of North Korea?

2006-10-03 11:25:27 · 14 answers · asked by big-brother 3 in Politics & Government Politics

North Korea to conduct nuclear test
1 hour, 5 minutes ago

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061003/ap_on_re_as/nkorea_nuclear

2006-10-03 11:26:56 · update #1

14 answers

Hmmm..Notice were still technically AT WAR W/ NORTH KOREA..We called a momentary cease fire in the 50s and still have about 40,000 troops in South Korea "training"..(Theyve been building up the past few months, go figure)..

It wouldnt surprise me after Iraq if we break the cease fire and just take them out..

2006-10-03 11:29:35 · answer #1 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 2 0

Why do I get the feeling that this "American Free Press" is some sort of sensationalist supermarket check-out rag dealing in fictionalized hype? Odd that the US is told about this so-called missile by South Korea and Japan. You'd think our own radar would have spotted such a thing and it would have made big news. So this American Free Press quotes itself as a source which makes it even more suspicious.

Did you ever notice how two-headed babies are always found in some remote province of Tibet that no one can ever get to? Same thing here. Missile hits the US and only the South Korean and the Japanese know about it. I don't think so.

I may look dumb but I'm not that stupid.

2006-10-03 11:37:53 · answer #2 · answered by Kokopelli 7 · 2 0

Nothing like a two and a half year old article to make a point I guess lol.

In case you weren't paying attention about a month and a half ago, they tested the "2" missile and it failed to even reach Hawaii. It was reported that the "3" blew up on the launch pad when it was tested originally. Tenants report is an intelligence estimate (which is really an educated guess). Remember, we went to war on the Intelligence Estimate of Iraq's wmd program. . . Why can't we use it for them too?lol

2006-10-03 11:31:26 · answer #3 · answered by trc_6111 3 · 2 0

You answered yourself: It is because North Korea already has nuclear weapons. If Iran goes nuclear tonight, Iran will similarly be hands-off.

Another relevant difference is that the North Korean dictator is not in the mood for suicide; no virgins waiting for Koreans in the afterlife. Mutually-assured-destruction will have to suffice. The Iranian dictators have a different view on life, and mutually-assured-destruction no longer is appropriate for radical Jihadis.

2006-10-03 11:48:10 · answer #4 · answered by A professor (thus usually wrong) 3 · 1 0

it would not BE A WW3 until eventually each and every of the UN countries JOINS interior the war! anticipate China to think of approximately their financial trades with th US and being a communist united states of america collectively with their neighbor North Korea. If North Korea sends a missile in the direction of the U. S. it is going to be shot down. If it heads to Russia it would additionally be shot down. yet whilst it hits the two Hawaii or South Korea the U. S. might retaliate with military wrestle. And we by potential of a few distance has the 2nd greatest military even nonetheless we've our troops scattered all over the middle East. If we would have liked extra troops the UN might help us out. countries might comprise the united kingdom, South Korea, and Japan(even nonetheless they technically have a military). yet in all likelihood here countries would desire to attempt to help Canada, France, and Russia. and of course China will attempt to barter and calm each and everything down the superb they are able to yet they gained't circulate to war with the two counrties they are saving their troops in case of a military protection. yet we don't prefer help, yet whilst we combat this war on my own we can be spending the quantity of funds into the 1000's of billions. All i prefer is for the U. S. to convey back "THE DRAFT" we'd demolish North Korea. Plus even whilst Kim Jong Il dies his 26 year previous son Kim Jong Un "The Prince" will take over because of the fact the hot chief and that i heard this youngster is as vicious as his dad and chilly hearted like him too.

2016-10-15 11:51:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Bush Administration is not composed of liberals, therefore they can do two things at once, like walk and chew gum. They can take care of the Korean and the Iranian problem at the same time.

2006-10-03 12:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

thats a very good question .... Nkorea is definitely more threatning than iran ... i guess it just goes to show that they have a plan in the middle east ... im sure after things are sown up there we will get to Nkorea in due time unless they get too stupid ... then we will probably just turn it into a huge smoldering crater of glass in the morning and be watching monday night football in the evening ..

2006-10-03 11:32:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First reason, Iran has oil. Lots and lots of oil!

Second reason is that the christer head cases we have turned our country over are bound and determined to bring about Armageddon, so that Jesus can return and take them to some other place where they can cause more problems.

2006-10-03 11:33:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Such stupid ramblings - I bet you believe everything you read in the supermarket tabloids too, don't you? Try reading something reputable for a change - get an education.

2006-10-03 12:59:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We know that just like Russia, the Koreans dont want to die, so they will threaten and boast, but as long as they think we will strike back, they wont do anything.
Iran and its leaders want to die and are willing to take you with them.
So tell me, who would you wanna pay more attention to, or are you just another retarded towell head,willing to kill your kids just to prove a point.

2006-10-03 11:31:10 · answer #10 · answered by scary g 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers