2006-10-03 10:44:21 · 7 answers · asked by Paka 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I consider myself an independent, but I have probably voted Republican most of the time, at least in the presidential elections. To me, the candidate's religion, or even lack of religion, would make little or no difference. I have known a number of Mormons over the years, and I have found them to be good people. I think a Mormon president would be good for America.
2006-10-03 10:54:46 · answer #1 · answered by Carlos R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am no longer a Republican -- because I am no longer going to vote -- but the last time I did vote in a Presidential election, 2000, the candidate I most strongly preferred to be the nominee was a Mormon -- Orrin Hatch. I believe in following the law of the Constitution, which tells me not to base my decision of who to vote for on religion.
2006-10-03 11:56:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. he's an usually happening to undesirable speaker and has an exceedingly scattered coverage list. He had the great element about a politically extra homogeneous inhabitants which made coverage progression an deployment a lot less complicated. He develop into no longer extraordinarily staggering as ambassador to China throughout that tenure, even with he's like for my section i do not see him as being really presidential. Thinkingblade
2016-12-04 04:33:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Republican and if the Candidate is "well qualified" by my definition I could care less if they are Mormon, Buddhist, Catholic, Male, Female, Black, White or Asian.
2006-10-03 11:43:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why Republicans. Your antireligious party is the Democrats. Ask them.
2006-10-03 10:51:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would bias anyone who's not a 50 year old racist repluican jerk
2006-10-03 10:48:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is only one m in moron.
2006-10-03 12:50:16 · answer #7 · answered by mudbawnz 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋