Or would you prefer to see the money spent ensuring breast cancer patients have the medication refused them on the grounds of their expense?
2006-10-03 10:11:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ General Health Care ➔ Other - General Health Care
wel they spend 20,000 on art and decorating the hospitals so why not? personaly, i think if the patient wants a sex change they should pay for it, but that's the government, they let thousands in for free, and yet we have so many homeless this whole country is f****** up
2006-10-03 10:27:31 · answer #1 · answered by white_funny_girl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hospitals for the most part, along with most health care facilities, are for-profit organizations. Therefore, if someone wants to pay for gender reassignment (which hospitals make you pay for) then they can. If a breast cancer patient wants meds (not really the hospital's surgery center's problem) they should pay for them also. It's just like any other business, fair or unfair, you get what you pay for.
2006-10-03 10:28:26 · answer #2 · answered by J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Patients who are selected for gender reassignment don't see their surgery as non essential - alot of these patients have serious gender identity disorders and this can be more costly than surgery.
The NHS would be better off if the government stopped all the endless reorganisation and allow the people who work in it run it and save money!
2006-10-06 04:27:35 · answer #3 · answered by talia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't matter what the operations the hospital performs-the patient pays for it. Now, if an inmate wants a gender reassignment surgery, that's another story...
2006-10-03 10:23:59 · answer #4 · answered by Aliza E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some data approximately Bachmann. She continuously contends that worldwide warming is a hoax. Bachmann voted against the college value alleviation and get right of entry to Act; she brazenly known greater fees of pastime and commercial lenders particularly than decrease pastime government-run direct lending. She needs to diminish all government investment for planned Parenthood. Bachmann opposes minimum salary will strengthen. Bachmann has called for phasing out of Social protection and Medicare. Electing Bachmann could be the nail interior the coffin for the U. S. high quality of life. Her 'each and every guy for them-self' philosophies might bring about an excellent larger hollow between the wealthy and the poor; on an identical time as shrinking the already threatened center-type. All this from somebody who accomplished her bachelors degree from Winona State college and her regulation degree from Oral Roberts college (based by skill of evangelist Oral Roberts in 1963). Bachmann isn't any blue-blood elitist, yet by some skill has distanced herself from looking after the hardship-unfastened guy.
2016-12-12 19:55:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
gender reassignment is paid for by the patient, not the hospital.
2006-10-03 10:13:23 · answer #6 · answered by essentiallysolo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no! If I found out my tax dollars were going to some freak who wanted to get his wiener chopped off I'd hunt him/her down and chop it off myself and kill the nasty bastard! As for your question about breast cancer meds I would definetly want to see my money going to a worthy cause which would definetly be a yes!
2006-10-03 10:27:09 · answer #7 · answered by LKJ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should decapitate all trans gender freaks.
2006-10-03 10:19:16 · answer #8 · answered by jinenglish68 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
agreed
2006-10-03 10:14:29 · answer #9 · answered by timone 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋