No, that's ridiculous. If I wanted to splurge on a fancy pair of shoes, I'd spend maybe... $600 tops. The $ could be put to MUCH better use.
2006-10-03 10:14:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
2 million dollars for a pair of shoes is unreasonable, even if i were rich.
2006-10-03 10:24:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by DJ Alex 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
OMG NO!!!! I would spend more money than usual of course,but I would still be watching price tags & putting stuff back on the rack because it costs too much.
2006-10-03 10:13:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NOOO!!! I Would Rather Donate It To A Third World Country!!
2006-10-03 10:12:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
With those style of high priced products, i think of they're in debt greater desirable than they're wealthy. regrettably, it extremely is the unhappy scenario in our us of a. The greater we gets a commission, the greater we spend and the greater credit we gain. The charges, loans and mortgages get astronomical.
2016-12-12 19:55:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, I wouldn't even spend that much on a house.
2006-10-03 10:25:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nico 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I were rich my money would not be in dollars!
2006-10-03 10:30:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by john b 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but I would buy enough socks and nylons to never wear anything but a brand new set every day!!!!
2006-10-03 10:13:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Step into the Freezer 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
ack no way. I'd pay off my house save for my kids college then donate money for lung cancer research(my mom died of that) and donate to other causes.
but shoes no way.........
2006-10-03 10:14:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by no 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope.. I might be rich (ha, I wish) but I still have a brain...
2006-10-03 10:12:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by misery 7
·
1⤊
0⤋