English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-03 08:50:54 · 19 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Even the FBI did not know about the IM's.
Funny that they get released ONE day after the time when Foley's name could be replaced on ballots.

2006-10-03 08:57:18 · update #1

19 answers

LMAO! The dems here are so full of hate that they can't even see your point! They HAD to be holding onto those IM's all that time. How long are such messages stored? They are as guilty as Foley himself. And WORSE than Hastert, who thought it was just "the way" of that gay guy from florida. 'Gotta keep him to silence the libs with their anti gay accusations'.

2006-10-03 09:05:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Typical Republican spin. Foley was the perv who was sending the messages, Republicans enabled him. That's who endangered children. That's worse than blaming the Democrats for voting for Bush's war. You think there was a demo plot to sit on Foley's IMs then think it's a wild conspiracy theory that Bush planned 911. (Actually that is a wild conspiracy theory but your theory is just as bad)

2006-10-03 16:20:01 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1 0

I can't imagine the Democrats would sit on something like that. They would have exposed him in a second. The Republicans are the only ones with reason to hide it. For this kind of thing to go public would greatly damage the reputation of Republicans, and during a time when they are struggling to keep control of Congress they wouldn't want anything to hurt them more. To Republicans the only tragedy about this situation is that Foley was caught, not that he committed the act to begin with.

2006-10-03 15:54:41 · answer #3 · answered by Alex 3 · 5 1

You're watching too much Daily Show.

You want to blame the Democratic party, for actions done by a Republican, and investigated by Republicans. When the first news reports about the conduct were made public in 2004.

{shakes head at silly partisan bickering}

2006-10-03 16:11:50 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

awww ain't that cute! see how the family values Republicans spin and contort themselves while they do they're little Pedophile avoiDance.

for going on 6 yrs with the entire gov run by Republicans no matter what stupid or heinous things the Republican neoCON slime do it's been ...

"but but Clinton"

now it's ...

"butt butt Foley"

and the "party of family values" is STILL trying to blame Democrats for what Republicans do. i guess Republican family values means never having to take responsibility for anything ... ever. no wonder most of them are Fundy Christians who are well versed in the use of scapegoats.

2006-10-03 16:32:02 · answer #5 · answered by nebtet 6 · 0 0

no, don't believe everything that comes out of George W. Bushes mouth, it's the republicans that are in control now, they make mistakes, and then blame the democrats, democrats couldn't make a mistake if they wanted to because so many people are buying that garbage they have zero power, things would be so much better if Al Gore had been elected president, but since he wasn't, it's like hell on earth in some places, and I don't just mean in some other countries, it's living hell in a lot of places in America:(

2006-10-03 15:58:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

No one knows if any one was sitting on anything.
and tell me why do the democrats get brought up in this mess,as always jump on the democrats with out any prove
This is a republican who did this leave the democrats out of it.

2006-10-03 15:58:57 · answer #7 · answered by sandyjean 4 · 2 1

Hey genius, where's your proof that they had knowledge of the IM's three years ago? Fox news knew of them, are you going to bash them? Why don't you come back with facts instead of spouting lies out your pie hole. Setting?

Suspenseless, where's your proof sheeple?

2006-10-03 16:06:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think Foley endangered them, wasn't he sending the IM's

2006-10-03 15:53:14 · answer #9 · answered by Star 4 · 5 2

How could they be setting on them .Any how sitting on information to be used at a later date should be a crime . Ithink it might be but i am not the state attorney .

2006-10-03 16:03:11 · answer #10 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers