Here is an example of the answers posted by obvious libs.
Posted by some moron: No, If anything, Bush is a sellout to the Saudis. They are one of the biggest sponsors of terrorism and Bush walks around holding hands with their leaders. (LITERALLY)
Real mature
2006-10-03 08:40:52 · 10 answers · asked by buffman316 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The moron is getting his information from the Daily show. Enough said.
2006-10-03 08:49:02 · update #1
Liberals are always saying we should be going after a country and currently bashing our government for the countries we are at war with.
2006-10-03 08:50:16 · update #2
LMAO, careful, they may do like their cigar weilding poster child and start crying....
2006-10-03 08:49:25 · answer #1 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Thanks for using my answer in your question. It is a great honor. I dont find it immature at all. I have seen (and actually it was on last night's Daily Show) a pic of Bush hand in hand with the leader of Saudi Arabia. The fact is that Saudi Prince Bandar is nicknamed Bandar Bush because of his closeness to the Bush Family. The Bush Administration quickly moved all of Bin Laden's family, WITHOUT ALLOWING ANY INTERROGATION, out of the US immediately after 9/11. you are the moron, my friend, if you think Bush cares about America. He is all about his back pocket and who can make that bigger.
Oh and to answer your question...Why do we have to be at war with anyone? Why not use diplomacy to bring peace to the world instead of bombing whomever is displeasing you at the moment?
OK so criticize the Daily Show. Apparently its a good enough show for Republican Senator Trent Lott to appear on the same episode and promote his book. The Daily Show and John Stewart are unabashed liberals, but they treat stupidity and criminal acts by both parties in a fair and unbiased manner. I have seen them hammer Dems many times on that show. Its more fair than O'Reilly and Fox , for sure.
2006-10-03 08:47:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I am a proud liberal, and the point isn't that we should be going to war with anyone. The point is the hypocritical statements made that we are going to war in Iraq to help the people get free of a tyranical government, when we really are at war for one thing only, oil and the wealth it brings to Bush and his cronies. If we were trying to help people we would become involved in Africa where people are being slaughtered and starved by tyranical governments who do not care about their people, but they have no oil. If we were going to war to make the world safer, we would be going to war with Korea who is continually threatening nuclear war, but they have no oil. We choose Iraq, they have oil.
2006-10-03 08:56:01 · answer #3 · answered by irongrama 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If Bush goes to war with Saudi Arabia, I would just suppose it was further evidence of brain damage.
2006-10-03 08:49:04 · answer #4 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That moron happens to be right, show me a link anywhere that a Iraqi was in on 9/11, if he is a moron then you are an idiot.
2006-10-03 08:51:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I know, I'll wait and see how your Mr. Foley weighs in on this moronic question. He may have a few regrets about sending some his "boys" into harms way...
2006-10-03 10:44:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's almost comical to see you criticize the maturity level of ANYONE else on this forum. As far as your question goes: no one; Liberals aren't bent on finding conflict like some of their lovely opponents.
2006-10-03 08:47:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
That would be Irak part 2.
2006-10-03 09:42:57 · answer #8 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are questioning peoples maturity with the questions you post??
2006-10-03 09:21:28 · answer #9 · answered by carpediem 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
why is bush planning something for the november elections?
2006-10-03 08:48:06 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋