English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just a tiny portion of the printable exchanges between a middle age Congressman (who was supposedly fighting against child internet porn) and a teenage boy:

Maf54: You in your boxers, too?
Teen: Nope, just got home. I had a college interview that went late.
Maf54: Well, strip down and get relaxed.

Another message:

Maf54: What ya wearing?
Teen: tshirt and shorts
Maf54: Love to slip them off of you....

The language gets much more graphic, too graphic to be broadcast, and at one point the congressman appears to be describing Internet sex.

Federal authorities say such messages could result in Foley's prosecution, under some of the same laws he helped to enact.

"Adds up to soliciting underage children for sex," said Brad Garrett, a former FBI agent and now an ABC News consultant. "And what it amounts to is serious both state and federal violations that could potentially get you a number of years."

Source: ABC News

2006-10-03 08:32:41 · 7 answers · asked by Agenda Dog 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

What sick, sick people to actually JUSTIFY Foley's actions by stating that Democrats do it too! Well, all races, colors, religions, peoples have child molesters--guess it's OK then!!!! Sick hypocrite freaks--I hope they take that same uncaring position--and defense of the pervert--if THEIR children are ever molested by a Republican!

2006-10-03 08:37:20 · update #1

7 answers

I never want to read what he said to that boy, I just hope he gets kicked out and server's time.
And I am sure there are others that know what he was doing,I hope they are found out and punished along with him.
This is unbelievable that one of the highest offices in Washington have these kind of men working in there, god help us all, the government has gone to hell.

2006-10-03 08:52:03 · answer #1 · answered by sandyjean 4 · 1 0

Were the individuals in question "underaged"? At least one of the "boys" was 16, and I believe that is the age of consent in DC. Of course what Foley did was wrong. But hey, he's gay and he drinks (as I said in another post, THAT's a redundancy...).

What about a Democrat "molesting" a child? After all, Foley started out as a Democrat. Maybe THAT'S the true root of his moral corruption.

Love Jack

2006-10-03 09:08:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm pretty sure that other than yelling "FIRE" in a crowded theater, we still have the right to free speech. Foley did not comitt any crimes and in DC, where the messages were sent, the age of consent is 16.

The larger issue here is why certain groups sat on this information until such a time as the election was upon us and ballots were printed so there was not time to re-print the ballots. THAT is the true disgrace.

Oh, and congrats on being able to cut-n-paste. Quite a skill.

2006-10-03 08:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0 4

What replaced into occurring to our u . s .! We found out what replaced into occurring with the Communist social gathering and their flow against our rights. basically as now, there are over 70 Communists in our Senate as Senators! What else replaced into revealed? The Communist social gathering did a brilliant study on American historic past in why we nonetheless had our freedoms and did no longer enable government takeover of those! It replaced into our shape! It states no government provides us our rights as we are born with them! because of the fact the government does not grant them it is extremely complicated for them to take them away, except people enable it! we come across a sprint candy to radical communities is all it takes! Our freedoms are in threat and the genuine difficulty is the left went radical left and helps even giving Communist countries our secrets and strategies like invoice Clinton did and as Obama has performed. It replaced into treason with the two yet they have been given away with it! Earl

2016-10-18 10:29:50 · answer #4 · answered by agudelo 4 · 0 0

maybe the more apropos term for mr foley would be "poster boy"..

2006-10-03 08:41:05 · answer #5 · answered by lugar t axhandle 4 · 2 0

No he's not the Republican's hero, they are throwing him to the wolves as well.

2006-10-03 08:36:08 · answer #6 · answered by Judge Dredd 5 · 0 0

IF DEMOCRATS **** THIS UP...IT WILL BE AN AWESOME MESS!!!

2006-10-03 13:03:14 · answer #7 · answered by Vox Populi Vox Dei 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers