English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Absolutely. Any time a woman marries a man of aristocracy, she takes on the counterpoint of his title.

The only exception is when a queen marries. Then her husband takes on the title of "Queen's Consort" because his title has to be less than hers. This is because the title "King" is higher than "Queen", therefore he would be the ruler. As royalty usually follows the bloodline, then she would have to retain rulership and her husband would have to take her name instead of the other way around.

2006-10-03 21:32:45 · answer #1 · answered by Shadow Dancer 2 · 1 0

Yes, although she can choose not to use it, like Lady Haden-Guest (Jamie Lee Curtis). The wife of a marquess, earl, viscount or baron is a marchioness, countess, viscountess or baroness, but is commonly refered to as 'Lady X'. The wife of a knight or baronet (a hereditary knight) is called 'Lady (husband's lastname)'. And a woman who marries the younger son of a duke or marquess, who is called for example Lord John Russell, would be called Lady John Russell. Lady Colin Campbell continues to anger her ex-husband by using the title decades after their brief marriage ended.

Women who sit in the House of Lords prefer to be called 'Baroness' even though barons are commonly called 'Lord', so that they are not confused with the wives of peers or knights. They want it to be clear that they have the title in their own right, so one would say 'Baroness Thatcher' not 'Lady Thatcher' (though from 1990-92 she was simply 'Lady Thatcher' as her husband was a baronet).

2006-10-03 11:06:03 · answer #2 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 0 0

Yes but Lord is not a title,it is the way you address a man with certain titles.

2006-10-03 14:32:20 · answer #3 · answered by Jen 3 · 0 1

Well Lord and Lady are not the titles. A Duke or Earl would be refered to as Lord and their wives, the Duchess or Countess would be refered to as Lady so and so. I think as concerning a knighthood Sir Anthony Hopkins wife would be called Lady Hopkins. The children or Lords are also refered to as Lords and Ladies.

2006-10-03 09:15:37 · answer #4 · answered by Constant_Traveler 5 · 0 1

The lordship title for someone who has attained a Grant of Arms, an award given by the Crown (refer to King or Queen), can pass on the title to his wife as it is just customary that his wife automatically will bear in her name the noble honor of being called my lady as well. However, she will lose that title if she remarries.

2006-10-03 08:57:30 · answer #5 · answered by ~Charmed Flor~ 4 · 0 1

yes whilst they are married, but as soon as he remarries she is not entitled to use the title.

Also only if the peerage is hereditary does it pass to the children, so whilst Lady Margaret Thatcher is a Lady, her son and daughter will never be a Lord or Lady, where as Lord Linley, Princess Margaret's son will pass the title of Lord or Lady to his children

2006-10-03 08:34:40 · answer #6 · answered by Breeze 5 · 0 0

Usually, "lord" is just an honorific form of addressing a person who has some kind of title.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord See this stuff.

It is my impression that someone knighted for some reason is called Sir X and his wife is thereafter called Lady X, but acutal nobility have other rules of address.

The Brits will be better able to tell us.

2006-10-03 08:32:02 · answer #7 · answered by sonyack 6 · 0 1

Yes

2006-10-03 08:25:05 · answer #8 · answered by Weston G 1 · 1 0

i'm accountable, i've got suggested that on right here, lol. i've got suggested that concerning to the adult men in Northern California, the place I stay now. it rather is because of the fact they are actually not very bodily acceptable to me, yet then i'm comparing them to adult men in Southern California who stay alongside the coast and love going on to the sea coast & spend their unfastened time on the wellness club or partying, so it is not a honest assessment i assume. i'm attempting to get exhilaration from the constructive traits in them/him, even nonetheless it is not what i'm used to. i assume adult men who're pushed to fulfillment are a solid element and with me growing to be previous (i'm 24) that would desire to be my objective, yet i could be mendacity if I suggested that bodily i'm not nonetheless into the guy with the tan epidermis, white tooth, muscle tissues and attire nicely. it rather is humorous nonetheless, because of the fact I used as much as now those varieties of adult men and that they've been oftentimes undesirable in relationships. formerly this year after the guy I dated until eventually January became out to have a fiancee, i desperate as much as now nerdy adult men, and because then, each and every guy i've got dated so some distance has bored me in a fashion, yet then according to probability i'm in simple terms being impolite. I also have a dream guy in my recommendations, that's infrequently solid because of the fact fantasies for the alternative intercourse by no potential come genuine. each and every physique is genuine, fantasies are actually not.

2016-10-15 11:43:52 · answer #9 · answered by lurette 4 · 0 0

Officer a Duchess is address as your grace not lady

2006-10-03 12:35:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers